onc brain

About Β· curated by Nick Boehling, MD Β· @nb2276

2026-05-22

digest generated 2026-05-23

DBCG IMN2: IMNI OS HR 0.85, 15-yr survival 65.0% vs 60.8% in node-positive breast on modern systemic therapy; challenges node-count IMNI criteria.
Breast and prostate led. DBCG IMN2 (N=4541, 13.7yr f/u) confirms IMNI OS benefit in the modern systemic era, pushing back on node-count restrictions. PEACE V-STORM provides the first randomized signal for ENRT over MDT in pelvic nodal prostate recurrence (HR 0.62); phase 2 only. EORTC cutaneous lymphoma consensus adds guidance without trial data.

Lymphoma

EORTC consensus formalizes low-dose RT practice across cutaneous subtypes; no trial-level evidence for any dose recommendation.

EORTC Cutaneous Lymphoma RT Recommendations

ForPrimary cutaneous lymphoma (all subtypes), any stage requiring RT

EORTC expert consensus on low-dose RT for all primary cutaneous lymphoma subtypes; no controlled trial data; retrospective evidence only.

6 details
  • πŸ” Expert opinion + systematic literature review; not a clinical trial; no randomized dose-comparison data for any cutaneous lymphoma entity
  • πŸ” Covers all primary cutaneous lymphoma subtypes: T-cell (MF, SΓ©zary syndrome) and B-cell (PCMZL, PCFCL, PCDLBCL leg-type)
  • πŸ’Š Low-dose RT increasingly adopted; rationale: high radiosensitivity of cutaneous lymphoma lesions, low toxicity profile, retreatment feasibility
  • πŸ“Š No effect sizes reported in source; evidence base limited to retrospective case series + limited prospective TSEBT registry data in advanced-stage MF
  • ⚠️ No controlled trials defining standard dose for any specific entity; recommendations are consensus-driven, not trial-validated
  • ⚠️ Multi-institution, multi-national authorship (EORTC CLTG) lends credibility but cannot substitute for prospective randomized evidence
  • Optimal radiation dose per cutaneous lymphoma entity (prospective trial urgently needed)
  • Factors predicting outcomes following different radiation doses
  • Role of hypofractionation vs standard dosing across subtypes

Sourced from Khaled Elsayad et al.

πŸ“š Sources Β· πŸ“„ 1 paper
πŸ“„ PAPER Khaled Elsayad; Emmanuella Guenova; Chalid Assaf et al. Β· European Journal of Cancer (2024)
Radiotherapy in cutaneous lymphomas: Recommendations from the EORTC cutaneous lymphoma tumour group
Abstract
The number of primary cutaneous lymphoma patients receiving low-dose radiotherapy is increasing, though controlled clinical trials defining the standard radiation dose for each specific entity have not yet been completed. Radiation oncologists are left with making highly individualized decisions that would be better enriched by additional clinical evidence. In this expert opinion, we aim to provide a clear recommendation to improve the current practice of radiation oncology. In addition, existing literature has been reviewed to develop recommendations for all types of primary cutaneous lymphoma. A prospective trial is urgently needed to identify the factors influencing patient outcomes following different radiation doses.

Prostate

Pelvic nodal oligorecurrence is gaining trial-level attention; PEACE V-STORM is the first randomized read in this space.

PEACE V-STORM NCT03569241

ForPET pelvic nodal oligorecurrence ≀5 nodes, post radical local treatment, WHO PS

PEACE V-STORM: 4-yr MFS 76% vs 63% favoring ENRT over MDT in pelvic nodal oligorecurrent prostate cancer, HR 0.62.

vs leading data
  • First randomized trial comparing MDT vs ENRT for PET-detected pelvic nodal recurrences; prior evidence from single-arm series only
CONSORT flow
Assessed / enrolled 198
↓ 2 excluded
Randomized 196
↓
MDT
allocated 99
analyzed 97
ENRT
allocated 97
analyzed 93
10 details
  • πŸ“Š 1Β° EP (4-yr MFS): 76% (80% CI 69-81) ENRT vs 63% (80% CI 56-69) MDT
  • πŸ“ HR 0.62 (80% CI 0.44-0.86); p=0.063
  • πŸ” Phase 2, open-label, randomized; N=196 randomized, 190 evaluable; 21 sites (Europe + Australia); median f/u 50 mo (IQR 42-58)
  • πŸ” MDT arm: salvage LND or SBRT 30 Gy/3 fx + 6 mo ADT
  • πŸ” ENRT arm: 45 Gy/25 fx whole-pelvis + SIB 65 Gy to PET-positive nodes + 6 mo ADT
  • πŸ” Eligible: PET-detected pelvic nodal oligorecurrence ≀5 nodes post radical local treatment, WHO PS 0-1
  • πŸ“Š G3 AEs
    • Urinary incontinence: 6% MDT vs 10% ENRT
    • Diarrhea: 1% MDT vs 2% ENRT
    • No treatment-related deaths
  • ⚠️ Trial powered to 80% CI (phase 2 screening design); conventional two-sided p=0.063; authors explicitly call for phase 3 before adopting ENRT as SOC
  • ⚠️ MDT arm heterogeneous (salvage LND vs SBRT vs SIB); comparisons within MDT types not reported in source
  • ⚠️ Stratified by PET tracer (choline vs PSMA); PSMA-era applicability may differ from choline cohort
  • Phase 3 confirmation of ENRT superiority over MDT
  • Optimal ENRT fractionation in PSMA-PET era
  • ADT duration optimization with ENRT

Sourced from Piet Ost et al.

πŸ“š Sources Β· πŸ“„ 1 paper
πŸ“„ PAPER Piet Ost; Shankar Siva; Sigmund Brabrand et al. Β· The Lancet Oncology (2025-05)
Salvage metastasis-directed therapy versus elective nodal radiotherapy for oligorecurrent nodal prostate cancer metastases (PEACE V–STORM): a phase 2, open-label, randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Background Various locoregional treatments exist for PET–CT-detected pelvic nodal oligorecurrences in patients with prostate cancer. We aimed to assess whether elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) to the pelvis would be superior to metastasis-directed therapy (MDT).<br/>Methods PEACE V–STORM is a phase 2, open-label, randomised, controlled trial conducted in 21 hospitals in Australia, Belgium, Italy, Norway, Spain, and Switzerland. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older, with WHO performance status 0–1 and a histologically confirmed initial diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the prostate, with a PET-detected pelvic nodal oligorecurrence (up to five nodes) following radical local treatment. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to MDT or ENRT. Randomisation was done online by minimisation with randomisation factor 0Β·80 and was stratified by type of PET tracer (choline vs prostate-specific membrane antigen) and type of MDT used (salvage lymph node dissection vs stereotactic body radiotherapy or simultaneous integrated boost). Participants and researchers were not masked to treatment assignment. Patients in the MDT group had salvage lymph node dissection or stereotactic body radiotherapy (30 Gy in three fractions every other day), with 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy. Patients in the ENRT group received a 45 Gy dose in 25 fractions to the pelvis with a simultaneous integrated boost of 65 Gy to the PET-positive nodes or salvage lymph node dissection, with 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy. The primary endpoint was metastasis-free survival, defined as the time between randomisation and the appearance of a metastatic recurrence (any M1) on PET imaging or death due to any cause, and was analysed per modified intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03569241, and the Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal, SNCTP000002947, and is active, not recruiting.<br/>Findings Between June 11, 2018, and April 30, 2021, 198 patients were screened for eligibility, 196 of whom were randomly assigned to MDT (n=99) or ENRT (n=97), with 190 evaluable patients (MDT n=97 and ENRT n=93). All patients were male. Data on race and ethnicity were not collected. Median follow-up was 50 months (IQR 42–58). 4-year metastasis-free survival was 63% (80% CI 56–69) in the MDT group and 76% (69–81) in the ENRT group (HR 0Β·62 [80% CI 0Β·44–0Β·86]; p=0Β·063). The most common grade 3 adverse events were urinary incontinence (six [6%] of 97 in the MDT group vs nine [10%] in the ENRT group) and diarrhoea (one [1%] in the MDT group vs two [2%] in the ENRT group). No treatment-related deaths occurred.<br/>Interpretation To our knowledge, this is the first randomised trial for metachronous PET-detected nodal recurrences comparing two local treatment approaches (MDT and ENRT) in combination with 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy. By showing an improved metastasis-free survival with ENRT, this trial establishes ENRT as a potential standard treatment approach, awaiting a phase 3 trial confirming these results.<br/>Funding Movember Foundation, Kom Op Tegen Kanker, Stichting tegen Kanker.

Breast

IMNI benefit holds in the modern systemic era; DBCG IMN2 reopens the node-count question for guideline committees.

DBCG IMN2 NCT06549920

ForNode-positive breast cancer, taxane/AI/trastuzumab era, 3D-based RT

DBCG IMN2: IMNI improved OS HR 0.85 (0.76–0.94), 15-yr survival 65.0% vs 60.8% in node-positive breast cancer on modern systemic therapy.

vs leading data
  • DBCG IMN1 (2003–07, N=3089, 14.8yr f/u): abs OS gain 4.7%; DBCG IMN2 confirms benefit persists in modern systemic era
  • EBCTCG regional node meta-analysis (n=12,167): 3% abs OS at 15yr; those trials predate taxane/trastuzumab era
7 details
  • πŸ“Š 15-yr OS 65.0% (IMNI) vs 60.8% (no IMNI)
  • πŸ“Š All endpoints favored IMNI
    EndpointHR (95% CI)p
    OS0.85 (0.76–0.94)0.0016
    Breast cancer mortality0.84 (0.74–0.95)0.0077
    Distant metastasis0.87 (0.78–0.98)0.026
  • πŸ” Prospective nationwide cohort, N=4541, Jan 2007–May 2014; right-sidedβ†’IMNI, left-sidedβ†’no IMNI; median f/u 13.7 yrs
  • πŸ” Systemic tx: taxane-based chemo, AIs, trastuzumab; 3D-based RT across six Danish centres
  • ⚠️ Non-randomized cohort; laterality-based allocation cannot exclude right/left-sided tumor biology confounders
  • ⚠️ No subgroup identified for IMNI omission, including 1–3 node pts; challenges guidelines restricting IMNI to β‰₯4 nodes
  • ⚠️ 15-yr cardiac death 0.2% right-sided (IMNI) vs 0.7% left-sided (no IMNI); left-sided IMNI cardiac impact not tested here
  • Benefit in post-2014 era (CDK4/6 inhibitors, newer HER2 agents, PARP inhibitors)?
  • Will 1–3 node guideline change require randomized confirmation or is this cohort evidence sufficient?
  • Cardiac risk of left-sided IMNI in modern 3D-based RT era (left-sided pts excluded from IMNI here)

Sourced from Anders W. MΓΈlby Nielsen et al.

πŸ“š Sources Β· πŸ“„ 1 paper
πŸ“„ PAPER Anders W. MΓΈlby Nielsen; Lise B. J. Thorsen; Demet Γ–zcan et al. Β· The Lancet Regional Health - Europe (2025-02)
Internal mammary node irradiation in 4541 node-positive breast cancer patients treated with newer systemic therapies and 3D-based radiotherapy (DBCG IMN2): a prospective, nationwide, population-based cohort study
Abstract
Background Internal mammary node irradiation (IMNI) improves overall survival (OS) in node-positive breast cancer patients. However, the effect is not documented in breast cancer patients treated with newer systemic therapies and 3D-based radiotherapy (RT). Therefore, the Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG) IMN2 study aimed to investigate the effect of IMNI in node-positive breast cancer patients treated with newer systemic therapies and 3D-based RT.<br/>Methods DBCG IMN2 was a nationwide population-based cohort study prospectively allocating node-positive breast cancer patients with right-sided tumours to IMNI and patients with left-sided tumours to no IMNI in six RT centres. Exclusion criteria were prior malignancies, bilateral breast cancer, neoadjuvant systemic therapy, recurrence before RT, or non-standard RT. Systemic treatment included taxane-based chemotherapy, aromatase inhibitors, and trastuzumab. The primary end-point was OS. Secondary endpoints were breast cancer mortality and distant metastasis. Cox regression analyses were used for adjusted hazard ratios (HR). Clinicaltrial.gov ID: NCT06549920.<br/>Findings In the period January 2007–May 2014, a total of 4541 patients were included. Patient characteristics were distributed evenly between right- and left-sided patients. Median follow-up was 13.7 years for OS. Survival rates at 15 years were 65.0% in patients with IMNI and 60.8% without leading to an adjusted HR of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.76–0.94; p = 0.0016) for OS. Corresponding HRs were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.74–0.95; p = 0.0077) for breast cancer mortality and HR 0.87 (95% CI, 0.78–0.98; p = 0.026) for distant metastasis. No subgroups were identified for the omission of IMNI. The 15-year cumulative incidence of death from ischemic or valvular heart disease was 0.2% (95% CI, 0.0–0.5) in right-sided and 0.7% (95% CI, 0.4–1.2) in left-sided patients.<br/>Interpretation IMNI reduced distant metastasis and breast cancer mortality and improved OS in node-positive breast cancer patients, despite treatment with newer systemic therapies and 3D-based RT.