onc brain

About · curated by Nick Boehling, MD · @nb2276

2026-05-22

digest generated 2026-08-11

PEACE V-STORM: elective pelvic nodal RT lifts 4yr MFS 76% vs 63% over MDT alone, HR 0·62 (80% CI 0·44-0·86), p=0·063.
Two field-size questions, same answer direction: covering more elective nodal volume bought outcome in both PEACE V-STORM (pelvic ENRT over MDT, locoregional RFS 85% vs 62%) and DBCG IMN2 (IMNI, 15y OS 65.0% vs 60.8%, HR 0.85). Prostate and breast carried the day, though neither is a conventionally powered randomised read: α=0·20 in one, laterality-allocated in the other. Lymphoma adds expert-opinion dose guidance only.

Lymphoma

Reduced-dose RT algorithm across cutaneous lymphoma subtypes, built entirely on retrospective and small single-arm data.

EORTC Cutaneous Lymphoma Tumour Group RT Recommendations

TL;DRExpert-opinion dose recommendations consolidating reduced-dose RT (4-12 Gy) across cutaneous lymphoma subtypes; no randomised trials underpin any of it.

Why it mattersRadiation oncology

The operative number for an RT reader is the dose floor, not the ceiling: 8-12 Gy in two or three fractions holds ≥92% 1-yr local control in MF, while 4 Gy underperforms there but suffices for CD4+ small/medium T-LPD (100% remission, no relapses). That split is the prescribing decision, and it argues against one ultra-low-dose default across subtypes.

Monday clinic

In a patient with a symptomatic MF plaque or an indolent pcMZL/pcFCL lesion, this supports prescribing 8-12 Gy rather than a 30-40 Gy course; it does not extend to advanced MF, Sézary syndrome, or DLBCL leg type, where the authors concede combined-modality room for improvement.

The longer read
11 details 1 trial watching

Expert opinion from the EORTC cutaneous lymphoma tumour group, tabulating published retrospective and small prospective series (Tables 1 and 2) into a dose algorithm (Figs 2A/2B). No pooled estimate, no protocol-registered synthesis.

Covers MF, Sézary syndrome, pcALCL, CD4+ small/medium T-LPD, pcMZL, pcFCL, and DLBCL leg type. Explicitly excludes the aggressive CTCL variants (subcutaneous panniculitis-like, gamma/delta, CD8+ epidermotropic, NK/T), where the authors say low-dose RT has a limited role.

MF plaques/tumours 8-12 Gy in two or three fractions; low-dose TSEBT 8-12 Gy for palliation and up to 24 Gy pre-autologous transplant; pcALCL few relapses at 20 Gy, palliative 2×4 Gy; CD4+ T-LPD 4 Gy in two fractions; DLBCL leg type consolidation reduced to 30 Gy, with 20 Gy reported post-systemic. Modalities named: electrons, photons, kilovoltage X-ray, brachytherapy.

The efficacy signal is uniformly high ORR across the tabulated series, but the discriminating result is dose-dependent local control: 92% 1-yr local control after low-dose MF RT versus an inferior rate at 4 Gy, and 28% vs 5% local relapse for 4 Gy vs 8-50 Gy in the ILROG registry series (p < 0.001).

Grade 3/4 toxicity is absent across most tabulated low-dose series. The one clear dose-toxicity signal in MF local RT is 27% grade 3/4 following 12 Gy versus 0% after 4-8 Gy; a prospective DLBCL leg-type cohort reported 14%.

The reference frame is the 30-40 Gy conventional standard that governed cutaneous lymphoma until roughly two decades ago. This document formalises the retreat from it, but does so on a base the authors concede is retrospective, so it codifies practice already in motion rather than establishing it.

indolent primary cutaneous lymphoma treated with skin-directed RT (MF plaques/tumours, pcALCL, CD4+ T-LPD, pcMZL/pcFCL)
Does not represent advanced MF, Sézary syndrome, or the aggressive CTCL variants, where the authors state the RT role is unsettled or limited.

The dose tables mix single-lesion and per-patient denominators and span decades of technique, so a 4 Gy series and a 40 Gy series are not comparing like populations. Several tabulated rows report dose comparisons as n.s. in cohorts far too small to exclude a real difference, which is not the same as equivalence.

The unresolved question is not whether reduced dose works but where its floor sits, and the answer looks subtype-specific rather than universal. The authors' own response-adapted proposal (escalate to a cumulative 24 Gy for residual disease or failure after 4 Gy) concedes that 4 Gy alone is a starting position, not a definitive prescription.

  • Dose floor for ultra-low-dose RT in indolent cutaneous B-cell lymphoma
    n=52 · primary completion 2025-12 · 4 Gy/2 fx in early-stage PCBCL, n=52
  • Whether low-dose TSEBT plus immunotherapy prolongs remission in advanced MF/SS
  • RT dose after systemic therapy in DLBCL leg type

Sourced from Khaled Elsayad et al.

📚 Sources · 📄 1 paper
📄 PAPER Khaled Elsayad; Emmanuella Guenova; Chalid Assaf et al. · European Journal of Cancer (2024)
Radiotherapy in cutaneous lymphomas: Recommendations from the EORTC cutaneous lymphoma tumour group

Breast

IMNI benefit at 15y, including the guideline-contested 1-3 node group, but allocation was by laterality rather than randomisation.

Challenges SOC

DBCG IMN2 NCT06549920

ForNode-positive breast cancer, macrometastatic, adjuvant taxane/trastuzumab/AI era

Overall survival

HR 0.85

95% CI 0.76-0.94, p=0.0016; 15y OS 65.0% vs 60.8%

TL;DRIMNI cut 15y mortality: OS 65.0% vs 60.8%, adjusted HR 0.85 (0.76-0.94), p=0.0016, in 4541 node-positive pts.

Why it mattersRadiation oncology

The 1-3 node group (n=3100, HR 0.85, 0.73-0.97) is the whole point: that is exactly where guidelines allow IMNI omission, and no measured factor identified a safe-omission subgroup. Right-sided IMN CTV V90% coverage was 94.6% with 25% under 64.8%, so a modern gated VMAT plan should exceed the dose separation that produced this 4.2% 15y OS gain.

Monday clinic

In macrometastatic node-positive breast cancer with 1-3 involved axillary nodes going to locoregional RT, this supports including the internal mammary chain rather than omitting it; it does not speak to pts treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy, who were excluded.

The longer read
12 details

Nationwide population-based prospective cohort across six Danish RT centres, 2007-14, allocating IMNI by tumour laterality (right yes, left no) under national guideline. N=4541 of 5206 assessed. Median follow-up 13.7 years for OS, 13.2 for distant metastasis; analysis was intention-to-treat by side.

Macrometastatic node-positive breast cancer receiving locoregional RT; median age 59; 68.3% had 1-3 positive nodes. Excluded: prior malignancy, bilateral disease, neoadjuvant systemic therapy, recurrence before RT, non-standard RT. Axillary surgery was always axillary dissection.

Chemotherapy was three cycles EC (epirubicin 900 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2) then three cycles docetaxel 100 mg/m2; 96.2% of chemo pts received a taxane. Tamoxifen premenopausal, aromatase inhibitor postmenopausal; trastuzumab concurrent with chemo and RT in HER2+ (13.5% overall).

48 Gy/24 Fx before Jan 2009 (26.2%), 50 Gy/25 Fx after (73.2%), 3D conformal wide tangents in free-breathing. IMN target was intercostal space 1-4; all pts had axilla level II-III plus interpectoral and level IV, with level I added for ≥6 positive nodes or <10 nodes removed. QA showed IMN CTV V90% 94.6% right vs 20.4% left.

Primary: overall survival. Secondary: breast cancer mortality and distant metastasis, both with non-breast-cancer death as a competing event. Cox models adjusted for age, menopausal status, histology, tumour size, and nodal count, stratified by IHC subtype and grade.

The OS point estimate sits on top of the EBCTCG regional-node meta-analysis rate ratio 0.90 (0.84-0.96) and of KROG 08-06's HR 0.87 (0.57-1.31), the only other 3D-based IMNI study, which was underpowered at n=735 and read as negative. It also reproduces DBCG IMN1's absolute OS gain of 4.7%, arguing the taxane/trastuzumab/AI era did not absorb the benefit.

right-sided macrometastatic node-positive breast cancer treated with 3D conformal locoregional RT plus taxane-based chemotherapy, trastuzumab, and aromatase inhibitors
Does not represent pts given neoadjuvant systemic therapy, and does not directly demonstrate efficacy in left-sided pts, in whom IMNI was withheld.

Contamination runs both ways: 10.1% of left-sided pts (n=238) got IMNI and a quarter of right-sided pts had under 64.8% IMN coverage, so the observed gain likely understates a fully delivered one. Cardiac and lung toxicity were captured only as death, with no smoking, comorbidity, or cardiac-event data, and the era predates PET-CT staging and respiratory gating.

The ER-/HER2+ signal (HR 1.49, 0.98-2.25, interaction p=0.021) echoes Kyndi's DBCG 82b&c finding but conflicts with NSABP B-51, and the analysis was explorative without multiplicity correction, so it should not gate treatment. The medial/central plus ≥4 node cell (HR 0.98, 0.79-1.21) is the one group where benefit looks absent, matching IMN1's 0.91 (0.73-1.15).

EndpointIMNINo IMNIAdjusted HR (95% CI), p
OS at 15y65.0%60.8%0.85 (0.76-0.94), p=0.0016
BC mortality at 15y21.4%23.6%0.84 (0.74-0.95), p=0.0077
Distant mets at 15y25.1%26.9%0.87 (0.78-0.98), p=0.026
CONSORT flow
Assessed / enrolled 5206
↓ 665 excluded
Randomized 4541
Right-sided (IMNI)
allocated 2194
analyzed 2194
15y OS 65.0%
Left-sided (no IMNI)
allocated 2347
analyzed 2347
15y OS 60.8%

Prospective nationwide cohort, prespecified primary endpoint, 13.7y follow-up; contradicts guidelines withholding IMNI at 1-3 nodes. Non-randomised laterality allocation keeps it below practice-changing.

  • Effect of IMNI alongside immunotherapy and antibody-drug conjugates
  • Is ER-/HER2+ a genuine predictive subtype for IMNI harm
  • Safe RT omission in cN+ pts with pCR after neoadjuvant therapy

Sourced from Anders W. Mølby Nielsen et al.

📚 Sources · 📄 1 paper
📄 PAPER Anders W. Mølby Nielsen; Lise B. J. Thorsen; Demet Özcan et al. · The Lancet Regional Health - Europe (2025-02)
Internal mammary node irradiation in 4541 node-positive breast cancer patients treated with newer systemic therapies and 3D-based radiotherapy (DBCG IMN2): a prospective, nationwide, population-based cohort study

Prostate

First randomised comparison of pelvic ENRT vs MDT alone for PET-detected nodal oligorecurrence, read at α=0·20 with 80% CIs.

Early signal

PEACE V-STORM NCT03569241

ForPelvic nodal oligorecurrence (≤5 nodes) on PET after radical local therapy

Metastasis-free survival surrogate

63% vs 76% at 4yr

HR 0·62 (80% CI 0·44-0·86), p=0·063; α set at 0·20

TL;DR4yr MFS 76% vs 63% with elective pelvic nodal RT over MDT, HR 0·62 (80% CI 0·44-0·86), p=0·063.

Why it mattersRadiation oncology

The clean radiation read is locoregional control, not MFS: 85% vs 62% at 4 years, HR 0·45 (80% CI 0·31-0·65), and pelvic nodal relapse fell from 29% to 8%. Toxicity did not follow the field: grade 2+ GI 9% vs 7%. Prostate bed inclusion, not pelvic volume, drove GI events (OR 4·6 [95% CI 1·5-15·8]).

Monday clinic

In a man with ≤5 PET-positive pelvic nodes after prostatectomy or definitive RT, this supports treating the whole pelvis with a nodal boost rather than nodes alone when 6 months of ADT is being given; it says nothing about node-negative biochemical relapse or extrapelvic disease.

The longer read
8 details

Phase 2, open-label, randomised 1:1, investigator-initiated, 21 hospitals across Australia, Belgium, Italy, Norway, Spain and Switzerland. Recruited June 11, 2018 to April 30, 2021; median follow-up 50 months (IQR 42-58). Stratified by PET tracer (choline vs PSMA) and MDT type (sLND vs SBRT); participants and investigators unmasked.

Biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy, postoperative RT, or definitive RT, with up to five PET-detected pelvic nodes (pelvis defined up to the aortic bifurcation, common iliac included). Bone, visceral, or above-bifurcation nodal disease excluded, as was previous RT overlapping current fields. Median age 70-71, median PSA at inclusion 1·00 vs 0·85 ng/mL, 91% and 86% EAU high-risk BCR, and 55-62% had a single positive node.

MDT arm: SBRT 30 Gy in 3 fractions every other day to 90% of the PTV with a 3 mm margin, or salvage lymph node dissection. ENRT arm: 45 Gy in 25 fractions to the whole pelvis on a modified RTOG 2009 template (upper limit L4-L5) with a simultaneous integrated boost to 65 Gy on PET-positive nodes; IMRT or rotational technique mandatory, with a benchmark-case QA programme. Prostate bed RT (≥66 Gy/33 fx) was advised for pT3-4, Gleason ≥8, or positive margins and given to 25% of MDT and 41% of ENRT pts.

Both groups received 6 months of LHRH agonist or antagonist, started no later than the first fraction (or day 1-10 postoperatively after sLND). Every patient who started intended local therapy plus ADT completed it. Physicians were instructed not to restart ADT absent clinical progression.

Primary: metastasis-free survival (any M1 on PET or death), with local or pelvic nodal relapse explicitly NOT counted as an event. Secondary: biochemical RFS, locoregional RFS, ADT-free survival, and late grade 2+ GU/GI toxicity to 48 months. OS, prostate cancer-specific survival, and time to castration resistance had insufficient events and are deferred.

Grade 2+ GU events above baseline at 4 years were 28% MDT vs 31% ENRT (absolute difference 3%, p=0·73) and grade 2+ GI 7% vs 9% (difference 2%, p=0·93). Most common grade 3 events were urinary incontinence (6% vs 10%) and diarrhoea (1% vs 2%). In post-hoc analysis the driver of toxicity was the prostate bed, not the pelvic volume: GI OR 4·6 (95% CI 1·5-15·8), p=0·0085 and GU OR 1·85 (0·95-3·60), p=0·068 with bed inclusion. No treatment-related deaths.

The single-arm GETUG-P07 OLIGOPELVIS reported 3-year bRFS of 45% for ENRT against 57% at 4 years here, though its median PSA was 3-4 ng/mL and staging was choline-based, so the populations differ. Against the ADT-intensification trials, EMBARK and PRESTO enrolled the PSA-doubling-time population that simulations put at up to 40% pelvic nodal relapse on PET, and this trial's median time off ADT exceeded 48 months in MDT and was not reached in ENRT, versus 13-18 months with RT alone and 16-17 months with ADT alone across earlier series.

men with PET-detected pelvic nodal oligorecurrence (≤5 nodes) after radical prostatectomy or definitive RT, mostly EAU high-risk biochemical relapse, receiving 6 months of ADT
Does not represent node-negative biochemical relapse, disease above the aortic bifurcation, bone or visceral metastases, or pts managed without concurrent ADT.

No central PET review at baseline or follow-up, so the primary endpoint depends on local reads (authors cite κ 0·74 for pelvic nodes). Curves did not separate in year 1 because of the shared 6 months of ADT, which strains the proportional hazards assumption the HR summarises. The open-label design plausibly biased adverse-event attribution in both directions, and prostate bed RT was left to physician discretion, so a treatment that materially changed both toxicity and local recurrence was not randomised.

The result reads as a field-size question answered on pattern of failure rather than on distant control: relapse after MDT was predominantly locoregional, meaning PSMA PET missed nodal disease in at least half of pts treated to visible targets only. That reframes ENRT less as escalation than as compensation for imaging sensitivity that has not caught up with the treatment paradigm it enabled.

EndpointMDTENRTHR (80% CI)p
MFS (1°)63% (56-69)76% (69-81)0·62 (0·44-0·86)0·063
Biochemical RFS41% (34-47)57% (50-64)0·62 (0·48-0·80)0·014
Locoregional RFS62% (55-69)85% (80-90)0·45 (0·31-0·65)0·0047
ADT-free survival60% (53-67)77% (70-82)0·60 (0·43-0·83)0·049
CONSORT flow
Assessed / enrolled 198
↓ 2 excluded
Randomized 196
MDT
allocated 99
analyzed 97
4yr MFS 63%
ENRT
allocated 97
analyzed 93
4yr MFS 76%

Phase 2 powered at α=0·20; primary MFS p=0·063 would not clear conventional significance, and the authors themselves await a phase 3 (POINTER-PC).

  • Does the MFS benefit hold at conventional significance in phase 3
  • Is ENRT plus ADT better than intermittent ADT alone
  • Should prostate bed RT be omitted when PSMA PET is bed-negative

Sourced from Piet Ost et al.

📚 Sources · 📄 1 paper
📄 PAPER Piet Ost; Shankar Siva; Sigmund Brabrand et al. · The Lancet Oncology (2025-05)
Salvage metastasis-directed therapy versus elective nodal radiotherapy for oligorecurrent nodal prostate cancer metastases (PEACE V–STORM): a phase 2, open-label, randomised controlled trial