onc brain

About ยท curated by Nick Boehling, MD ยท @nb2276

2026-05-27

digest generated 2026-08-11

SENOMAC: 5yr RFS 89.7% vs 88.7% without completion ALND, HR 0.89 (0.66-1.19), noninferior in 1-2 SLN macromets, but 90% got nodal RT.
Breast carried the day. SENOMAC clears completion ALND in cN0 pts with 1-2 sentinel macromets, and the axilla was still treated: ~90% of both arms received RT covering nodal target volumes, with 34.5% harboring non-SLN disease at dissection. Read it alongside AMAROS/OTOASOR, not Z0011.

Breast

Surgical de-escalation of the axilla continues to lean on nodal RT rather than replace it.

Practice-changing

SENOMAC NCT02240472

ForcN0 T1-T3 breast, 1-2 sentinel-node macromets, planned nodal RT

Recurrence-free survival (prespecified secondary; primary endpoint is overall survival) surrogate

HR 0.89

95% CI 0.66-1.19, P<0.001 for noninferiority (margin 1.44)

TL;DR5yr RFS 89.7% vs 88.7% omitting completion ALND, HR 0.89 (0.66-1.19), noninferior in 1-2 SLN macromets.

Why it mattersRadiation oncology

The axilla here was irradiated, not left alone: 89.9% vs 88.4% received nodal target volumes, so this validates SLNB plus regional nodal RT, not surgical de-escalation without RT. Untreated non-SLN disease was present in 34.5%, meaning the RT field is carrying real burden. Nodal level doses and volumes are not yet reported.

Monday clinic

In cN0 T1-T3 disease with one or two sentinel macrometastases, including mastectomy, T3 and extracapsular extension, this supports omitting completion dissection when regional nodal irradiation is planned; it does not speak to pts in whom nodal RT is being omitted.

The longer read
13 details 5 trials watching

Prospective randomized phase 3 noninferiority trial, 1:1, 67 hospitals in Sweden, Denmark, Germany, Greece and Italy. 2766 enrolled Jan 2015 to Dec 2021; per-protocol population 2540 (1335 sentinel-node biopsy only, 1205 completion dissection). Median follow-up 46.8 months (range 1.5 to 94.5).

cN0, T1 to T3 breast cancer with one or two sentinel-node macrometastases (>2mm). Preoperative axillary ultrasound was mandatory; suspicious nonpalpable nodes were still eligible even with FNA-confirmed metastasis. Additional micrometastases and extracapsular extension were allowed, and both breast-conserving surgery (63.3% / 64.3%) and mastectomy (36.7% / 35.7%) were eligible. Mean age 61.

RT including nodal target volumes was given to 89.9% (1192/1326) of the sentinel-node-only group and 88.4% (1058/1197) of the dissection group. Whole-breast RT was mandatory after breast-conserving surgery, but the protocol stipulated no specific target volumes or doses, deferring to national guidelines. QA on 1154 plans showed eCRF-to-plan concordance of 99.3% for breast or chest wall and 96.6% for nodal volumes.

Primary: overall survival (switched from breast cancer-specific survival in 2020 on DSMB advice). Prespecified secondary endpoints were recurrence-free survival, breast cancer-specific survival and patient-reported outcomes. Noninferiority required the upper CI bound for recurrence or death below 1.44.

No clinical lymphedema measurements were performed; arm morbidity relies on the LYMPH-ICF, QLQ-C30, QLQ-BR23 and EQ-5D questionnaires at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years. Only 1-year data from a Swedish-Danish subpopulation are published; 3-year data for the whole trial are not yet available.

Consistent with ACOSOG Z0011 and AMAROS, but the authors place SENOMAC alongside AMAROS and OTOASOR rather than Z0011, SINODAR-ONE or POSNOC, because nodal irradiation was routine here. Where the earlier trials enrolled nearly 40% micrometastasis-only pts, one T3 patient between them, and only 248 mastectomies (17.4%) in AMAROS, SENOMAC filled each of those gaps.

cN0 T1 to T3 breast cancer with one or two sentinel macrometastases, including mastectomy, T3 tumors and extracapsular extension, treated with adjuvant systemic therapy and nodal irradiation per Nordic guidelines
Does not represent pts managed without regional nodal RT, men (only 10 enrolled), or micrometastasis-only disease.

Detailed nodal level doses and volumes are not yet reported, so the RT dose actually treating the residual axilla is unquantified. Withdrawal was higher in the dissection arm, reflecting pts' wish to avoid the operation. The ER+/HER2+ subgroup HR of 0.26 (0.07-0.96) rests on 3 versus 10 events among 13 subgroups and should not be read as a real interaction.

The completion dissection arm shows what is being left behind: 34.5% (403/1167) had additional non-sentinel-node metastases, rising to 51.3% with two macrometastases, and 9.9% were upstaged to pN2 with 3.0% pN3. Noninferior recurrence-free survival despite that residual burden is a statement about what systemic therapy plus nodal RT can control, not about the axilla being clean.

EventSLNB only (N=1335)cALND (N=1205)
Local recurrence12 (0.9)10 (0.8)
Regional recurrence6 (0.4)6 (0.5)
Distant recurrence44 (3.3)53 (4.4)
Death62 (4.6)69 (5.7)
Recurrence or death as first event95 (7.1)96 (8.0)
CONSORT flow
Assessed / enrolled 2766
โ†“
Randomized 2540
โ†“
Sentinel-node biopsy only
allocated 1335
5yr RFS 89.7%
Completion axillary dissection
allocated 1205
5yr RFS 88.7%

Prespecified noninferiority met with wide margin to boundary; enrolls the mastectomy, T3 and ECE subgroups Z0011 and AMAROS excluded, resolving the residual uncertainty.

Sourced from de Boniface, Jana et al.

๐Ÿ“š Sources ยท ๐Ÿ“„ 1 paper
๐Ÿ“„ PAPER de Boniface, Jana; Filtenborg Tvedskov, Tove; Rydรฉn, Lisa et al. ยท New England Journal of Medicine (2024-04)
Omitting Axillary Dissection in Breast Cancer with Sentinel-Node Metastases