onc brain

About ยท curated by Nick Boehling, MD ยท @nb2276

2026-06-29

digest generated 2026-06-30

BART: adjuvant pelvic RT post-cystectomy cuts 2yr locoregional failure (LRFFS 87.1% vs 76.0%, HR 0.43, p=0.04); no OS benefit (HR 0.78, ns).
Bladder carried the day. BART, the first phase III of adjuvant pelvic RT after radical cystectomy, roughly halves locoregional failure (8% vs 26%) in high-risk MIBC, benefit concentrating in N+/T3+ pts. OS unchanged, and the trial predates adjuvant nivolumab, so the RT+IO question stays open.

Bladder

First randomised evidence for adjuvant RT after radical cystectomy, though underpowered and analyzed per-protocol.

BART

ForUrothelial MIBC, high-risk (โ‰ฅpT3 / N+ / R+), post-cystectomy + chemo, M0

TL;DR2yr locoregional FFS 87.1% vs 76.0% with adjuvant RT post-cystectomy, HR 0.43 (0.20-0.96), p=0.04; OS not improved (HR 0.78, ns).

Reported via UroToday โ†’

Why it mattersRadiation oncology

Offer adjuvant pelvic RT (50.4Gy/28fx, cystectomy bed plus iliac/presacral/obturator nodes) to โ‰ฅpT3, N+, or margin-positive pts, where benefit concentrates (N+ HR 0.22) and isolated locoregional failure was eliminated. Late grade 3+ toxicity matched observation (8.4% vs 10.5%, p=0.60), answering the late-morbidity fear. Read it as local control: OS was unchanged.

Radiation Curative Phase 3 RCT Challenges SOC

9 details 1 trial watching
  • ๐Ÿ” Phase III RCT, N=153 (RT 77 / obs 76), high-risk (T3-4, N1-3, R+) MIBC post-cystectomy + chemo, 2016-2024
  • ๐Ÿ” RT: cystectomy bed + pelvic nodes (common/internal/external iliac, presacral, obturator), 50.4Gy/28fx, stoma/bowel-sparing IMRT, daily IGRT
CONSORT flow
Randomized 153
โ†“
Adjuvant RT
allocated 77
analyzed 63
Observation
allocated 76
analyzed 90
  • ๐Ÿ“Š 2yr outcomes, adjuvant RT vs observation (LRFFS primary, rest secondary)
    Endpoint (2yr)RTObsHR (95% CI)p
    LRFFS87.1%76.0%0.43 (0.20-0.96)0.04
    DFS71.6%58.7%0.62 (0.36-1.05)0.07
    BCSS79.6%65.0%0.59 (0.33-1.10)0.09
    OS70.4%57.4%0.78 (0.49-1.26)0.31
  • ๐Ÿ“Š LR recurrence 8% (RT) vs 26% (obs), p=0.006; no isolated locoregional recurrences with RT
  • ๐Ÿ“Š 2yr LRFFS benefit concentrates in high-risk subsets (and per-protocol)
    2yr LRFFS analysis/subgroupHR (95% CI)
    Per-protocol0.27 (0.10-0.71), p=0.008
    T3+ and N+0.25 (0.07-0.84)
    N+ disease0.22 (0.06-0.75)
  • ๐Ÿ“Š Toxicity, RT vs observation
    AERTObsp
    Grade 3 GI1.6%4.1%n/a
    Grade 2 GI17.5%1.4%n/a
    Late grade 3+8.4%10.5%0.60
  • โš ๏ธ Primary analysis per-protocol, not ITT: 14 RT-assigned pts (refused 8, progression 4, unfeasible 2) analyzed in observation arm
  • โš ๏ธ Underpowered: trial missed its accrual target
  • โš ๏ธ No immunotherapy given; predates adjuvant nivolumab as SOC, so doesn't address the RT+IO question
  • OS benefit unconfirmed pending MERCY individual-patient-data meta-analysis
  • Adjuvant RT plus immunotherapy combinations with non-overlapping toxicity
    n=10 ยท primary completion 2027-04 ยท phase 1 adjuvant concurrent IO + RT safety in bladder
  • Generalizability without immunotherapy and in younger cohort (median age 57)
๐Ÿ“š Sources ยท ๐Ÿ“„ 1 paper
๐Ÿ“„ PAPER ยท UroToday
ASTRO 2025: Bladder Adjuvant Radiotherapy (BART): Clinical Outcomes from a Phase III Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
ASTRO 2025 phase III Bladder Adjuvant Radiotherapy (BART), Advanced bladder cancer, cystectomy, advanced muscle invasive bladder cancer.
๐Ÿ“ https://www.urotoday.com/conference-highlights/astro-2025/astro-2025-bladder-cancer/163510-astro-2025-bladder-adjuvant-radiotherapy-bart-clinical-outcomes-from-a-phase-iii-multicenter-randomized-controlled-trial.html