onc brain

About Β· curated by Nick Boehling, MD Β· @nb2276

2026-11-10

digest generated 2026-11-10

CTV-P consensus: CTV-P1 = GTV-P + 5 mm, CTV-P2 = GTV-P + 10 mm, both anatomically edited, for definitive RT of laryngeal, hypopharyngeal, oropharyngeal and oral cavity SCC.
This is a day of contouring guidelines with no outcome data. Four H&N documents set primary CTV margins (GTV + 5 and 10 mm), elective neck levels, node-level boundaries and 5 mm / β‰₯30 mm nerve-path CTVs for V1/V2/V3 PNI. ESTRO ACROP LA-NSCLC discourages elective nodal coverage beyond the hilum and adjacent stations. Margins rest largely on expert opinion.

Head & Neck

Primary CTV guidance converges on GTV + 5 mm for high dose and + 10 mm for low dose, always edited at anatomical barriers, with neck levels drawn per the 2013 consensus atlas.

Trigeminal nerve (V) contouring guidelines in head and neck cancers

TL;DRPractical CTV guidance for PNI along V1/V2/V3: CTV-P1 = GTV + 5 mm along nerve; CTV-P2 = nerve path β‰₯30 mm, skull base often recommended.

Trials discussed

EORTC 22931

Why it mattersRadiation oncology

The β‰₯30 mm CTV-P2 extension exists because MRI underreads PNI extent: extent misdefined in 17% and 11% of surgical-correlation series, and radiologic skip lesions sit on pathologically continuous disease. That gap is the argument for elective retrograde nerve-path coverage toward skull base in ACC, extensive-PNI SCC, and PPF or masticator invasion.

Monday clinic

In H&N SCC with extensive PNI, ACC, or PPF or masticator space invasion, this supports retrograde nerve-path CTV-P2 coverage toward skull base; it does not extend to focal microscopic PNI without other high-risk features, which the authors leave case-by-case. The longer read

10 details 2 trials watching

Practical contouring guideline from a multi-institution author group, built on V1/V2/V3 radio-anatomy, PNI spread routes, and published imaging series. No outcome endpoint.

Primary RT: GTV = post-contrast enhancement along the nerve; CTV-P1 = GTV + 5 mm along the nerve path; CTV-P2 β‰₯30 mm along the nerve, skull base often recommended. Post-op R1: CTV-P1 = margin + 5 mm along the nerve path plus PNI in the whole tumor bed. Skull base involvement extends CTV-P2 to the brainstem.

High-risk spread is defined by histology (ACC; cutaneous or non-cutaneous SCC with extensive PNI) or site (pterygopalatine fossa or masticator space invasion, nasopharyngeal or maxillary sinus primaries). Non-lateralized tumors get bilateral nerve-path consideration.

Imaging guidance: MRI is the modality of choice, CT complements for foraminal bony change, and 18FDG-PET-CT is often inferior to MRI for macroscopic PNI. MRI co-registration in treatment position is recommended whenever possible.

ScenarioHigh-risk CTV (CTV-P1)Low-risk CTV (CTV-P2)
Primary RT, unresected macroscopic PNIGTV (post-contrast enhancement along nerve) + 5 mm along nerve pathNerve path β‰₯30 mm; extension to skull base discussed, often recommended
Post-op RT, resected macroscopic PNI with R1 marginPositive margin + 5 mm along nerve path; PNI in entire tumor bedPer histology/site risk (row below)
High-risk histology or site (ACC, SCC with extensive PNI, PPF or masticator invasion, NPC, maxillary sinus)PNI in tumor bedNerve path β‰₯30 mm per primary site; skull base discussed, often recommended
Skull base or intracranial involvementAs aboveExtend CTV-P2 to the brainstem

EORTC 22931 included pts with PNI and showed concurrent cisplatin improved locoregional control over post-op RT alone. The Zukauskaite primary-RT series placed most recurrences in the GTV but excluded the PNI-prone sites this guideline targets.

H&N SCC, ACC and cutaneous cancers with macroscopic or extensive microscopic PNI along V1, V2 or V3
Does not represent focal microscopic PNI without other high-risk features, where adjuvant RT stays case-by-case.

No dosimetric or failure-pattern validation of the margins is reported. Large CTV-P2 extensions near brainstem and optic pathway force OAR compromises the guideline leaves to case-by-case judgment.

The document standardizes nerve-path delineation where IMRT planning on axial CT routinely misses retrograde spread. It does not settle how far elective coverage must go, or whether skull base extension improves control enough to justify the added OAR dose.

Sourced from Biau, Julian et al.

πŸ“š Sources Β· πŸ“„ 1 paper
πŸ“„ PAPER Biau, Julian; Dunet, Vincent; Lapeyre, Michel et al. Β· Radiotherapy and Oncology (2019-02)
Practical clinical guidelines for contouring the trigeminal nerve (V) and its branches in head and neck cancers

Neck node level delineation: 2013 update consensus guidelines

TL;DRJoint DAHANCA/EORTC/HKNPCSG/NCIC CTG/NCRI/RTOG/TROG CT atlas defines neck node levels Ia through Xb by axial-CT boundaries, Robbins-modified nomenclature.

Why it mattersRadiation oncology

The boundary shifts that change a nodal CTV: level V now starts at the hyoid body, IVa stops 2 cm above the sternal manubrium with IVb and Vc filling the space below, and VIIa means the lateral retropharyngeal nodes only. Which levels to treat and to what dose is left to other guidance.

Monday clinic

In lower lip primaries and advanced gingivo-mandibular cancers invading chin soft tissue, this supports including VIa and starting VIb at the hyoid body; for other primary sites, VIa is not covered and VIb starts at the thyroid cartilage. The longer read

12 details 5 trials watching

Expert consensus from DAHANCA, EORTC, HKNPCSG, NCIC CTG, NCRI, RTOG and TROG: radiation oncologists, a head and neck surgeon and an anatomist. Boundaries are defined on axial CT and illustrated on sample slices, with a 110-slice DICOM-RT teaching set.

Defines levels Ia through Xb, including parotid (VIII), bucco-facial (IX) and retroauricular/occipital (Xa/Xb) groups for skin and salivary primaries. Landmarks assume a neutral neck position. Hyperextension to flatten skin folds shifts the Ib/II relationship, and the upper edge of C1 may then mark the cranial retropharyngeal limit better than the hard palate.

Nomenclature is modified from Robbins and cross-walked to the TNM atlas neck node groups. The source flags the cross-walk table as having uncertain row alignment, so no level-to-group pairing is reproduced here.

head and neck primaries treated with nodal RT in node-negative, node-positive and post-operative settings
Does not represent guidance on level selection by site or N stage, or on dose prescription.

Boundaries only hold in a neutral position; adapting them to hyperextension is left to clinical judgment. No interobserver or patterns-of-failure validation is reported in the source.

The panel's stated aim is to reduce delineation variation between patients and institutions and to make multi-institutional trials easier to run. It pairs naturally with separate guidance on which levels to treat for each primary site.

LevelCranialCaudal
Ia (submental)Mylo-hyoid m.Platysma m. (caudal edge of anterior belly of digastric mm)
Ib (submandibular)Cranial edge of submandibular gland; anteriorly, mylo-hyoid m.Caudal edge of hyoid bone and mandible, or of submandibular gland (whichever more caudal)
II (upper jugular)Caudal edge of the lateral process of C1Caudal edge of the body of the hyoid bone
III (middle jugular)Caudal edge of the body of the hyoid boneCaudal edge of cricoid cartilage
IVa (lower jugular)Caudal edge of cricoid cartilage2 cm cranial to sternal manubrium
IVb (medial supraclavicular)Caudal border of level IVaCranial edge of sternal manubrium
V (posterior triangle)Cranial edge of the body of hyoid bonePlane just below transverse cervical vessels
Vc (lateral supraclavicular)Plane just below transverse cervical vessels2 cm cranial to sternal manubrium
VIa (anterior jugular)Caudal edge of hyoid bone or submandibular gland, whichever more caudalCranial edge of sternal manubrium
VIb (prelaryngeal, pretracheal, paratracheal)Caudal edge of thyroid cartilageCranial edge of sternal manubrium
VIIa (retropharyngeal)Upper edge of body of C1/hard palateCranial edge of the body of the hyoid bone
VIIb (retro-styloid)Base of skull (jugular foramen)Caudal edge of the lateral process of C1
VIII (parotid)Zygomatic arch, external auditory canalAngle of the mandible
IX (bucco-facial)Caudal edge of the orbitCaudal edge of the mandible
Xa (retroauricular)Cranial edge of external auditory canalTip of the mastoid
Xb (occipital)External occipital protuberanceCranial border of level V

Sourced from GrΓ©goire, Vincent et al.

πŸ“š Sources Β· πŸ“„ 1 paper
πŸ“„ PAPER GrΓ©goire, Vincent; Ang, Kian; Budach, Wilfried et al. Β· Radiotherapy and Oncology (2014-01)
Delineation of the neck node levels for head and neck tumors: A 2013 update. DAHANCA, EORTC, HKNPCSG, NCIC CTG, NCRI, RTOG, TROG consensus guidelines

CTV-P delineation consensus guidelines (laryngeal, hypopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, oral cavity SCC)

TL;DRCTV-P1 = GTV-P + 5 mm and CTV-P2 = GTV-P + 10 mm, both anatomically edited, for definitive RT of laryngeal, hypopharyngeal, oropharyngeal and oral cavity SCC.

Why it mattersRadiation oncology

The volume is edited, not just expanded: air, mandible, hyoid, vertebrae and fascia trim it unless they are invaded. Two exceptions change the contour: T1 glottic disease gets no CTV-P2, and hypopharynx gets an optional 15 mm cranio-caudal CTV-P2 margin because submucosal spread reaches 20-30 mm.

Monday clinic

In intact laryngeal, hypopharyngeal or oropharyngeal SCC treated with definitive RT, this supports a high-dose CTV of GTV-P plus 5 mm inside a lower-dose CTV of GTV-P plus 10 mm, both anatomically edited; it does not extend to the postoperative bed or to recurrent disease. The longer read

7 details 1 trial watching

Multi-society consensus guideline for primary-tumour CTV (CTV-P) delineation, illustrated with endoscopic and planning-CT cases by subsite and T stage (UICC 8th edition).

CTV-P1 = GTV-P + 5 mm (high dose, typically 70 Gy in 2 Gy fx). CTV-P2 = GTV-P + 10 mm (50 Gy prophylactic with 2 levels, or 60 Gy intermediate with 3 levels, adding a 50 Gy CTV-P3). Delineate CTV-P2 first, then CTV-P1 inside it.

The margins rest on surgical evidence: Zanoni et al. found a 2.2 mm margin optimal for loco-regional recurrence-free survival, and laser microsurgery with 2-3 mm mucosal margins gave 85-95% local control without PORT. Tonsillar TORS/laser series with at least 2-3 mm margins report local control above 90%.

intact primary laryngeal, hypopharyngeal, oropharyngeal and oral cavity SCC in a primary treatment setting
Does not represent the postoperative or recurrent setting, where anatomy is perturbed.

Margin data come mostly from T1-T2 tumours in selected high-volume surgical series, and the HPV effect on required margin is unknown. Infiltrative-border tumours and tumour budding are acknowledged as sources of GTV uncertainty the 5 + 5 mm concept does not resolve.

The main gain is a shared nomenclature tying CTV-P1/P2/P3 to dose level plus stage-specific editing rules. It does not settle margin adequacy under RT, and PTV expansion is explicitly left to each centre.

Subsite / TCTV-P1CTV-P2Editing note
Glottic T1GTV-P + 5 mmNot recommendedExcludes thyroid cartilage and air cavity
Glottic T2GTV-P + 5 mmGTV-P + 10 mm; may omit if small/superficial, not from anterior commissureExcludes cricoid cartilage
Glottic T3-T4GTV-P + 5 mmGTV-P + 10 mmStops at strap muscles unless macroscopically invaded
Supraglottic T1GTV-P + 5 mmGTV-P + 10 mmIncludes pre-epiglottic and para-laryngeal space
Supraglottic T4GTV-P + 5 mmGTV-P + 10 mmStops at strap muscles unless invaded; T4b may enter vertebral body
Subglottic T1GTV-P + 5 mmGTV-P + 10 mm; optionale.g. 2 mm into cricoid cartilage adequate
Subglottic T2-T4GTV-P + 5 mmGTV-P + 10 mmExcludes vertebral body except T4b
Hypopharynx T1GTV-P + 5 mmGTV-P + 10 mm; optional if small/superficialExcludes retro-pharyngeal space
Hypopharynx T2-T4GTV-P + 5 mmGTV-P + 10 mm; consider 15 mm cranio-caudalNot through pre-vertebral fascia unless T4b
Oropharynx T1GTV-P + 5 mmGTV-P + 10 mmExcludes air, bone, mobile tongue
Volume2 dose levels3 dose levels
CTV-P170 Gy in 2 Gy fx over 7 wk70 Gy in 2 Gy fx over 7 wk
CTV-P250 Gy in 2 Gy fx over 5 wk (prophylactic)60 Gy in 2 Gy fx over 6 wk (intermediate)
CTV-P3Not used50 Gy in 2 Gy fx over 5 wk (prophylactic)
  • Is the 5 + 5 mm margin adequate in HPV-positive oropharynx?
  • Pattern-of-failure validation of edited CTV-P volumes under IMRT
  • CTV-P definition in postoperative and recurrent settings
    n=104 Β· primary completion 2027-10 Β· post-TORS RT allowing primary resection bed sparing

Sourced from GrΓ©goire, Vincent et al.

πŸ“š Sources Β· πŸ“„ 1 paper
πŸ“„ PAPER GrΓ©goire, Vincent; Evans, Mererid; Le, Quynh-Thu et al. Β· Radiotherapy and Oncology (2018-01)
Delineation of the primary tumour Clinical Target Volumes (CTV-P) in laryngeal, hypopharyngeal, oropharyngeal and oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: AIRO, CACA, DAHANCA, EORTC, GEORCC, GORTEC, HKNPCSG, HNCIG, IAG-KHT, LPRHHT, NCIC CTG, NCRI, NRG Oncology, PHNS, SBRT, SOMERA, SRO, SSHNO, TROG consensus guidelines

Target volume selection and delineation (T and N) for primary RT of oral cavity, oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal and laryngeal SCC

TL;DRElective neck levels II-IVa for N0 pharyngolaryngeal SCC and Ib-V for N2a-b/N3; primary CTV is GTV + 5 and 10 mm, anatomically edited.

Why it mattersRadiation oncology

The nodal dose recipe is the part that transfers: SIB with 54-56 Gy to elective levels, 70 Gy in 33-35 fx to nodal GTV + 5 mm, and 10 mm into abutting muscle or parotid as expert opinion. Danish 0-10 mm margin data put relapses mainly inside the GTV, which supports tighter primary CTVs.

Monday clinic

In N0 oropharyngeal or laryngeal SCC treated with definitive IMRT, this supports elective coverage of levels II-IVa rather than Ib-V. It does not extend to the postoperative neck, adenoid cystic histology or N2a-N3 disease. The longer read

11 details

Narrative review of international consensus guidelines for nodal level selection, node-level delineation and primary-tumor CTV, by authors from the guideline groups. No new patient data.

Primary RT for SCC of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx and larynx, p16-negative and p16-positive oropharynx alike. Not valid for the postoperative setting or adenoid cystic carcinoma. After induction chemo, contour from pre-chemotherapy information.

SIB: elective nodal PTV 54-56 Gy in 33-35 fx over 6.5-7 weeks. Therapeutic nodal CTV (nodal GTV + 5 mm) gets 70 Gy in 33-35 fx of 2.12-2.0 Gy. GTV + 10 mm anatomically edited becomes the low-dose CTV-P2, on 2 mm contrast-enhanced planning CT.

The consensus sits between the anatomic school (whole compartments, 2-3 cm where no barrier) and the DAHANCA geometric 5 + 5 mm rims. The authors expect consensus volumes to be smaller than anatomic volumes in all directions, and smaller than DAHANCA volumes mainly axially for T1-T2 tumors.

definitive-RT pts with oral cavity, oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal or laryngeal SCC, node-negative or node-positive
Does not represent postoperative necks, adenoid cystic carcinoma or T1N0 glottic tumors.

Support for margin reduction rests on one three-center Danish series and transoral resections in mainly T1-T2 tumors. The volume comparisons are single illustrative cases, and no systematic comparison of the three approaches had been done.

Nodal selection follows long-standing drainage-pattern data and changes little for most centers. The real shift is the smaller geometric primary CTV. Its safety depends on the geographic-miss analysis the authors describe as ongoing.

Nodal categoryOral cavityOropharynx / hypopharynx / larynx
N0Levels I-IIILevels II-IVa; + VIIa for posterior pharyngeal wall
N1As N0As N0, except hypopharynx (high nodal propensity)
N2a, N2b, N3Ib (Ia if anterior) to VIb to V; + VIIa (RP) for oropharynx and hypopharynx
N2cPer N category on each sidePer N category on each side
ApproachHigh-dose CTVLow-dose CTV
Anatomic (Eisbruch; GrΓ©goire/Daisne; Lapeyre)GTV + 3-10 mm by barrierWhole at-risk compartment; 2-3 cm where no barrier
Geometric (DAHANCA)GTV + 5 mmAdditional 5 mm
International consensusGTV + 5 mm, editedGTV + 10 mm, anatomically edited (CTV-P2)
  • Geographic-miss rate with 5 + 5 mm geometric primary CTV margins
  • Can elective nodal volumes shrink for p16-positive oropharynx?

Sourced from GrΓ©goire, Vincent et al.

πŸ“š Sources Β· πŸ“„ 1 paper
πŸ“„ PAPER GrΓ©goire, Vincent; Grau, Cai; Lapeyre, Michel et al. Β· Oral Oncology (2018-12)
Target volume selection and delineation (T and N) for primary radiation treatment of oral cavity, oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal and laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Thoracic / Lung

ESTRO ACROP LA-NSCLC: nodal GTV defined on PET-CT, CTV + 5-8 mm, and further elective nodal CTV graded as discouraged.

ESTRO ACROP target volume guidelines for locally advanced NSCLC

TL;DRGraded consensus (M/R/O/D) for LA-NSCLC contouring: PET-CT-defined nodal GTV, CTV +5–8 mm, elective nodal coverage beyond hilum/adjacent stations discouraged.

Why it mattersRadiation oncology

The nodal rule is the decision point: a PET-positive node stays in GTV even with negative EBUS/EUS, given high false-negative rates, and drops out only with a benign biopsy explanation or negative mediastinoscopy. Elective coverage stops at the hilum or adjacent stations (optional); anything wider is discouraged.

Monday clinic

In LA-NSCLC receiving induction chemo before definitive RT, this supports contouring the primary on post-chemo CT while keeping every pre-chemo involved node in the nodal GTV even when it has vanished on imaging; it does not inform stereotactic treatment of early-stage disease. The longer read

10 details

ESTRO ACROP committee consensus: structured questionnaire, then consensus discussion and voting, then literature-referenced writing and committee review. Each item graded Mandatory, Recommended, Optional or Discouraged.

CTV primary = GTV + 5–8 mm, manually edited at natural barriers such as bone or heart (M). Nodal CTV is either the whole involved station or a 5–8 mm geometric expansion (M). Elective hilum or adjacent stations are optional; further elective nodal CTV is discouraged.

curative-intent RT or chemo-RT for locally advanced NSCLC, conventionally or moderately hypofractionated, with PORT covered by analogy
Does not represent stereotactic schedules, for which its OAR list was not written.

Motion handling follows ICRU 62 (ITV) or the van Herk margin recipe; nodal stations follow the TNM Atlas 8th edition. Station-based nodal CTV is justified by large multicentre trials with acceptable out-field mediastinal recurrence, which the excerpt does not name.

Departments must quantify their own residual setup error, so PTV size is not standardised across centres. Leaving nodal CTV option 1 vs 2 open signals the committee could not settle it.

The guideline sets the threshold for including a node at inclusion when in doubt, accepting larger volumes over geographic miss. It does not quantify what elective coverage of the hilum adds, which is why that is left optional.

StepRecommendationGrade
StagingDiagnostic contrast CT + whole-body FDG-PET-CTM
StagingFDG-PET-CT within 3 weeks before treatment startR
Sequential chemoPET-CT before induction; repeat contrast chest CT before RTM
Nodal stagingBiopsy of enlarged or FDG-avid nodes if it changes TVR
Planning CTTreatment position, 2–3 mm slices, cricoid to mid abdomenM
MotionRespiratory-correlated 4D-CT assessmentR
Planning PET-CTDedicated scan, preferably in planning positionR
Nodal GTV post-chemoAll pre-chemo involved nodes/stations, even if vanished on imagingM
CTV primaryGTV + 5–8 mm, edited at anatomical barriersM
CTV nodalWhole involved station or 5–8 mm geometric expansionM
Elective hilum / adjacent stationsMay be includedO
Further elective nodal CTVNot recommendedD
PTVManual editing of PTVD
PTVIndividualised anisotropic margins, primary vs nodesR
OARsLungs, whole heart, oesophagus, spinal canal PRVM
QARadiation oncologist approves all contours before planningM
  • Station-based vs geometric nodal CTV: any difference in out-field failure?
  • Added value of 4D PET-CT for nodal target definition
  • Validated auto-contouring for LA-NSCLC target volumes

Sourced from Nestle, Ursula et al.

πŸ“š Sources Β· πŸ“„ 1 paper
πŸ“„ PAPER Nestle, Ursula; De Ruysscher, Dirk; Ricardi, Umberto et al. Β· Radiotherapy and Oncology (2018-04)
ESTRO ACROP guidelines for target volume definition in the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer