onc brain

About ยท curated by Nick Boehling, MD ยท @nb2276

2026-06-17

digest generated 2026-08-11

INDIBLADE: 2yr bladder-intact EFS 78% (0.67-0.9), 2yr OS 96% after induction ipi/nivo then chemoRT in cT2-4aN0-2 MIBC.
Bladder carries the day's only signal. INDIBLADE sequences induction ipi/nivo before chemoRT in cT2-4aN0-2 MIBC (node-positive and cT4a included): 2yr bladder-intact EFS 78%, 2yr OS 96%. Single-arm, and no RT dose, fractionation or target volume in source, so transferability is untestable.

Bladder

An IO induction layer in front of trimodality-style preservation, read single-arm, so it sets a benchmark rather than a comparison against standard CRT or cystectomy.

Early signal

INDIBLADE

ForStage II/III cT2-4aN0-2 MIBC, bladder-preservation candidates

Bladder-intact event-free survival surrogate

78% at 2yr

0.67-0.9

TL;DR2yr bladder-intact EFS 78% (0.67-0.9) after induction ipi/nivo then chemoRT in cT2-4aN0-2 MIBC; 2yr OS 96% (0.91-1).

Why it mattersRadiation oncology

The RT-relevant gap is technique: the source gives no dose, fractionation, radiosensitizer, or whether the pelvic nodes were covered, and the cohort explicitly includes N1-2 and cT4a, so elective nodal coverage is exactly the parameter a reader needs and does not get. Bladder-intact EFS 78% at 2yr is the endpoint that gates preservation counselling.

Monday clinic

In cT2-4aN0-2 MIBC where bladder preservation is already on the table, this supports discussing induction ipi/nivo before chemoradiation as investigational sequencing; it does not extend to cystectomy-eligible pts choosing surgery, nor to cT4b or M1 disease.

9 details

Single-arm bladder-preservation study of induction ipilimumab plus nivolumab followed by chemoradiation. Phase, N, number of sites and median follow-up are not reported in the source tweet; results are read out at 2 years.

Stage II/III muscle-invasive bladder cancer, cT2-4aN0-2. That range admits both node-positive and cT4a disease, a broader population than many bladder-preservation series. No further eligibility, performance status or baseline detail in source.

Induction ipilimumab + nivolumab, then chemoradiation. Dosing, number of induction cycles, and the concurrent radiosensitizer are not reported in source.

The chemoradiation component is named but not specified: no total dose, fractionation, technique, or target volume. Whether the cT4a and N1-2 pts received elective pelvic nodal coverage is unstated, which is the parameter that most gates transfer to another practice.

Primary read: 2yr bladder-intact event-free survival, 78% (0.67-0.9). 2yr OS 96% (0.91-1). Whether the trial prespecified bladder-intact EFS as its primary endpoint is not stated in source.

cT2-4aN0-2 MIBC pts pursuing bladder preservation with induction checkpoint blockade before chemoradiation
Does not represent cT4b, M1, or pts for whom upfront radical cystectomy is the chosen path.

The 96% 2yr OS sits well above what an unselected cT2-4aN0-2 population would predict, which points at selection; the source reports no eligibility filter to judge that against. With no cystectomy or pathologic-response denominator reported, bladder-intact EFS cannot be separated into pts who never needed salvage vs pts who declined it.

The claim on offer is that adding induction ipi/nivo raises the ceiling of trimodality therapy, but a single arm cannot isolate the immunotherapy's contribution from the chemoradiation backbone. What it does establish is feasibility: pts got through induction dual checkpoint blockade and still completed CRT, with 2yr OS 96%.

Single-arm induction immunotherapy plus CRT with 2yr follow-up and wide CI; no randomised comparator against standard chemoradiation or cystectomy.

  • Salvage cystectomy rate and pathologic response not reported
  • Immunotherapy contribution over chemoradiation alone unproven
  • Nodal coverage and RT dose for cT4a/N1-2 pts unstated

Sourced from @5_utr

๐Ÿ“š Sources ยท ๐Ÿฆ 1 tweet