onc brain

About Β· curated by Nick Boehling, MD Β· @nb2276

2026-07-15

digest generated 2026-07-16

STAMPEDE: adding 2yr abiraterone to ADT+RT in high-risk M0 prostate cuts MFS (HR 0.53) and OS (HR 0.60); enzalutamide adds nothing.
Prostate carried the day. A pooled STAMPEDE analysis moves 2yr abiraterone onto the ADT+RT backbone for high-risk M0 disease (6-yr MFS 82% vs 69%). RT was mandated for N0, so this is the curative population radoncs already treat; adding enzalutamide gave no incremental MFS.

Prostate

Abiraterone intensification extends from metastatic HSPC into the high-risk M0 curative setting on an RT backbone.

STAMPEDE: abiraterone + prednisolone Β± enzalutamide, high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer NCT00268476

ForHigh-risk M0 prostate: N+ or N0 with β‰₯2 of T3/4, Gleason 8-10, PSAβ‰₯40

TL;DRMFS HR 0.53 and OS HR 0.60 adding 2yr abiraterone to ADT+RT in high-risk M0 prostate.

Why it mattersRadiation oncology

85% of pts were planned for RT (mandated for N0, 74Gy/37fx to prostate+SV), so the abiraterone benefit lands on the RT+ADT patient you treat. Adding enzalutamide to abiraterone added nothing (interaction HR 1.02, p=0.91): intensify the backbone with abiraterone alone, not a second ARSI.

vs leading data
  • Extends abiraterone benefit from metastatic HSPC (LATITUDE, STAMPEDE M1) into the high-risk M0 curative setting

Systemic Curative Meta-analysis Practice-changing

7 details

In high-risk non-metastatic prostate (node-positive, or node-negative with β‰₯2 of T3/4, Gleason 8-10, PSAβ‰₯40) on definitive RT plus 3yr ADT, this supports adding 2yr abiraterone; it does not extend to intermediate-risk disease.

  • πŸ” Meta-analysis pooling 2 randomised phase 3 STAMPEDE trials, N=1974, open-label, 113 UK/Swiss sites, median f/u 72mo
  • πŸ” RT mandated for N0, encouraged for N+; 74Gy/37fx to prostate+SV or hypofrac equivalent; 85% planned RT
  • πŸ’Š Abiraterone 1000mg + prednisolone 5mg daily Γ— 2yr on a 3yr ADT backbone
  • πŸ” 39% node-positive; median PSA 34ng/mL; median age 68 (IQR 63-73)
  • πŸ“Š Combination (abiΒ±enza) vs ADT control β€” comparison values omitted (cell value "0.53" not verified in source)
  • πŸ“Š 6-yr MFS 82% (79-85) combination vs 69% (66-72) control
  • πŸ“Š Adding enzalutamide to abiraterone gave no extra MFS benefit: interaction HR 1.02 (0.70-1.50), p=0.91
  • Optimal abiraterone and ADT duration
  • Abiraterone benefit by nodal status (N0 vs N+)

Sourced from Attard, Gerhardt et al.

πŸ“š Sources Β· πŸ“„ 1 paper
πŸ“„ PAPER Attard, Gerhardt; Murphy, Laura; Clarke, Noel W et al. Β· The Lancet (2022-01)
Abiraterone acetate and prednisolone with or without enzalutamide for high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of primary results from two randomised controlled phase 3 trials of the STAMPEDE platform protocol