Kidney
2026-05-18
FASTRACK II (TROG 15.03) NCT02613819
ForInoperable/high-risk primary RCC, T1b-dominant, median age 77
TL;DR100% local control at 36/60/84 mo with SABR for primary RCC, no local recurrences or cancer deaths at median 62-mo f/u.
The actionable RT read: 100% local control at 36/60/84 mo under a size-stratified scheme transferable to practice, 26Gy×1 for ≤4cm and 42Gy/3fx for >4cm. Predominantly T1b (56%) with some T2a extends SABR past the small-renal-mass niche thermal ablation owns, moving the non-surgical-candidate decision toward SABR.
- First prospective phase 2 of SABR for primary RCC; prior evidence was retrospective (IROCK pooled cohorts)
9 details 3 trials watching
- 🔍 SABR dose by tumour size: 26 Gy single fraction for ≤4 cm; 42 Gy/3 fx (48h apart) for >4 cm
- 🔍 Non-randomised phase 2, 8 sites (Australia + Netherlands, TROG/ANZUP); 71 enrolled, 70 treated; median f/u 62 mo (IQR 60-72)
- 🔍 Eligible: medically inoperable, high risk, or declined surgery; ECOG ≤2; tumours ≤10 cm; N0-N1
- 🔍 Predominantly T1b; median tumour 46 mm (37-55), median age 77 (70-82)
- T1a: 24 (34%)
- T1b: 39 (56%)
- T2a: 6 (9%)
- T3a: 1 (1%)
- N1 nodal involvement: 1 (1%)
- 📊 1° EP freedom from local progression (RECIST, ITT): 100% local control at 36, 60, and 84 months
- ⚠️ Grade 3 AEs ≤9 mo in 7 (10%) pts, treatment-related; no grade 4, no treatment-related deaths, no new long-term signals
- Nausea/vomiting: 3 (4%) events
- Abdominal/flank/tumour pain: 4 (6%)
- Colonic obstruction: 2 (3%)
- Diarrhoea: 1 (1%)
- ⚠️ Single-arm: no randomised comparator vs partial nephrectomy or thermal ablation; non-inferiority not established
- ⚠️ Selected non-surgical cohort, T1b-dominant favourable biology; competing mortality high at median age 77
- ⚠️ Local control by RECIST: ablated masses can persist radiographically, so RECIST freedom-from-progression ≠ pathologic control
- Randomised SABR vs surgery or thermal ablation in operable candidates
- Local control and toxicity in tumours larger than 7 cm n=46 · primary completion 2025-01 · Cyberknife radiosurgery, primary RCC up to 8 cmrecruiting Interstitial Brachytherapy for the Treatment of Unresectable/Unablatable Kidney Cancer Phase 1n=17 · primary completion 2026-06 · interstitial brachytherapy for large kidney massesn=16 · primary completion 2028-12 · Y-90 radioembolization for T1b/T2 RCC >4 cm
- Long-term metastatic spread and cancer-specific survival
📚 Sources · 📄 1 paper
Abstract
2026-05-17
RCC SBRT 5yr LC
TL;DR100% local control at 5yr for RCC treated with SBRT; design, N, and comparator absent from source.
- High LC echoes prior primary-RCC SBRT data (IROCK consortium, FASTRACK II); no comparator numbers in source
6 details 4 trials watching
- 🔍 Design and eligibility not reported; primary vs metastatic RCC unspecified in source
- 🔍 Dose, fractionation, and target volume not reported, so transferability to practice can't be judged
- 📊 100% local control at 5yr (per source tweet)
- ⚠️ No N, denominator, or trial ID reported in source
- ⚠️ '100% LC' is the signature of a small single-arm SBRT series, not a randomised comparison
- ⚠️ Local control is not cancer control; no OS, MFS, or cancer-specific survival in source
- Durability of local control beyond 5 years
- How SBRT compares to partial nephrectomy / thermal ablation for primary RCC n=46 · primary completion 2025-01 · phase 2 SBRT in stage I (T1N0M0) primary RCCn=90 · primary completion 2027-11 · SABR as non-surgical alternative for primary RCC
- Cancer-specific and overall survival, not just local control n=20 · primary completion 2027-06 · proton-SBRT primary RCC, reports OS + PFSn=53 · primary completion 2027-12 · prospective primary RCC SBRT, curative intent
📚 Sources · 🐦 1 tweet
These results are so impressive!! 💯 local control at 5 years for RCC treated with SBRT@DrRanaMcKay @AdityaBagrodia @DrTylerStewart @DrYukselUrun @OncoAlert https://t.co/fUB3airM5g
— Tyler Seibert MD PhD (@TylerSbrt) May 17, 2026