onc brain

About · curated by Nick Boehling, MD · @nb2276

2026-05-18

FASTRACK II (TROG 15.03) NCT02613819

ForInoperable/high-risk primary RCC, T1b-dominant, median age 77

TL;DR100% local control at 36/60/84 mo with SABR for primary RCC, no local recurrences or cancer deaths at median 62-mo f/u.

Why it mattersRadiation oncology

The actionable RT read: 100% local control at 36/60/84 mo under a size-stratified scheme transferable to practice, 26Gy×1 for ≤4cm and 42Gy/3fx for >4cm. Predominantly T1b (56%) with some T2a extends SABR past the small-renal-mass niche thermal ablation owns, moving the non-surgical-candidate decision toward SABR.

vs leading data
  • First prospective phase 2 of SABR for primary RCC; prior evidence was retrospective (IROCK pooled cohorts)

Radiation Curative Phase 2 trial Early signal

9 details 3 trials watching
  • 🔍 SABR dose by tumour size: 26 Gy single fraction for ≤4 cm; 42 Gy/3 fx (48h apart) for >4 cm
  • 🔍 Non-randomised phase 2, 8 sites (Australia + Netherlands, TROG/ANZUP); 71 enrolled, 70 treated; median f/u 62 mo (IQR 60-72)
  • 🔍 Eligible: medically inoperable, high risk, or declined surgery; ECOG ≤2; tumours ≤10 cm; N0-N1
  • 🔍 Predominantly T1b; median tumour 46 mm (37-55), median age 77 (70-82)
    • T1a: 24 (34%)
    • T1b: 39 (56%)
    • T2a: 6 (9%)
    • T3a: 1 (1%)
    • N1 nodal involvement: 1 (1%)
  • 📊 1° EP freedom from local progression (RECIST, ITT): 100% local control at 36, 60, and 84 months
  • ⚠️ Grade 3 AEs ≤9 mo in 7 (10%) pts, treatment-related; no grade 4, no treatment-related deaths, no new long-term signals
    • Nausea/vomiting: 3 (4%) events
    • Abdominal/flank/tumour pain: 4 (6%)
    • Colonic obstruction: 2 (3%)
    • Diarrhoea: 1 (1%)
  • ⚠️ Single-arm: no randomised comparator vs partial nephrectomy or thermal ablation; non-inferiority not established
  • ⚠️ Selected non-surgical cohort, T1b-dominant favourable biology; competing mortality high at median age 77
  • ⚠️ Local control by RECIST: ablated masses can persist radiographically, so RECIST freedom-from-progression ≠ pathologic control
📚 Sources · 📄 1 paper
📄 PAPER Siva; Pryor; Martin et al. · The Lancet. Oncology (2026-05)
Long-term outcomes of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for primary kidney cancer (TROG 15.03 FASTRACK II): a multicentre, non-randomised, phase 2 study.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is an emerging, non-invasive alternative for primary renal cell carcinoma. We aimed to provide the final long-term trial outcomes of TransTasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) 15.03 FASTRACK II, the first phase 2 trial investigating SABR for primary renal cell carcinoma to our knowledge.<br/><br/>METHODS: FASTRACK II was a non-randomised, phase 2 study conducted in eight hospitals in Australia and the Netherlands by TROG and the Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group. Here, we report the final pre-planned follow-up results. Adult patients (aged &#x2265;18 years) with histologically confirmed primary renal cell carcinoma, who were medically inoperable, high risk, or declined surgery, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less, had tumours 10 cm or less in size, and had N0-N1 disease were included. Patients underwent either a single fraction SABR of 26 Gy for tumours 4 cm or less in maximum diameter, or 42 Gy in three fractions delivered 48 h apart for tumours more than 4 cm in maximum diameter. The primary outcome was freedom from local progression to assess local control after SABR evaluated with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours. The primary endpoint and safety were evaluated in the intention-to-treat population. A patient representative was involved in the study design and conduct. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02613819) and is closed to enrolment.<br/><br/>FINDINGS: Between July 28, 2016, and Feb 27, 2020, 71 patients were enrolled and one withdrew consent before treatment. Median follow-up was 62 months (IQR 60-72), median age was 77 years (70-82). 49 (70%) of 70 patients were male and 21 (30%) were female. Race and ethnicity data were not collected. The median tumour size was 46 mm (37-55), with 24 (34%) patients with T1a disease, 39 (56%) with T1b disease, six (9%) with T2a disease, and one (1%) with T3a disease. One patient (1%) had nodal involvement (N1). SABR resulted in 100% local control at 36 months, 60 months, and 84 months. Seven (10%) patients had at least one grade 3 adverse event within 9 months of SABR that was designated possibly, probably, or definitely related to treatment: nausea and vomiting (three [4%] events); abdominal, flank, or tumour pain (four [6%]); colonic obstruction (two [3%]); and diarrhoea (one [1%]). No new long-term safety signals, grade 4 events, or treatment-related deaths were noted.<br/><br/>INTERPRETATION: Long-term follow-up supports the safety and local control of SABR for non-surgical patients with renal cell carcinoma, with no observed local recurrences or cancer-related deaths in this cohort, which had predominantly T1b disease or higher.<br/><br/>FUNDING: The Cancer Australia Priority-driven Collaborative Cancer Research Scheme and Varian.
📝 Siva S, Pryor D, Martin J, Hardcastle N, Moon D, Kron T, Higgs B, Foroudi F, Ruben J, Sridharan S, Montgomery R, Davey R, Lin C, Shaw M, Lawrentschuk N, Appu S, Vanneste BGL, Hofman MS, Murphy DG, De Abreu Lourenco R, Mancuso P, Brook NR, Raman A, Wong LM, Sidhom M, Wood S, Ali M, Bressel M. Long-term outcomes of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for primary kidney cancer (TROG 15.03 FASTRACK II): a multicentre, non-randomised, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2026 May 17:S1470-2045(26)00091-4.

2026-05-17

RCC SBRT 5yr LC

TL;DR100% local control at 5yr for RCC treated with SBRT; design, N, and comparator absent from source.

vs leading data
  • High LC echoes prior primary-RCC SBRT data (IROCK consortium, FASTRACK II); no comparator numbers in source

Radiation Unclear

6 details 4 trials watching
  • 🔍 Design and eligibility not reported; primary vs metastatic RCC unspecified in source
  • 🔍 Dose, fractionation, and target volume not reported, so transferability to practice can't be judged
  • 📊 100% local control at 5yr (per source tweet)
  • ⚠️ No N, denominator, or trial ID reported in source
  • ⚠️ '100% LC' is the signature of a small single-arm SBRT series, not a randomised comparison
  • ⚠️ Local control is not cancer control; no OS, MFS, or cancer-specific survival in source
📚 Sources · 🐦 1 tweet