Oligometastatic / Mets
2026-05-18
EXTEND Trial
ForOligometastatic solid tumors, 1-5 metastases, mixed histologies
TL;DRPFS HR 0.54 (0.41-0.72), p<0.001 with added MDT across oligomet baskets; RT delivered 98% of MDT.
RT was the MDT for 98% of metastases (370/379), so HR 0.54 is effectively an RT-attributable effect, and it holds across non-prostate histologies (HR 0.60, 0.40-0.89). That widens the oligomet MDT offer beyond the prostate-dominated prior RCTs, though breast and kidney baskets stayed inconclusive, so gate those. RT dose/fractionation not in source, so transfer specifics are uncertain.
8 details 5 trials watching
- 🔍 Multicenter randomized phase II, 1-5 mets, 6 histology baskets (breast/pancreas/kidney/2 prostate/Other) with basket-specific powering
- 🔍 521 screened → 350 randomized → 334 per-protocol (MDT+SOC n=166, SOC n=168); median f/u 53mo, 2018-2023
- 🔍 Translational signals (exploratory)
- Detectable ctDNA at enrollment → shorter PFS and survival
- ctDNA clearance at 3mo post-enrollment → improved survival
- MDT-induced systemic immune activation greatest in PFS-superior baskets
- 📊 PFS by analysis set (MDT+SOC vs SOC)
Analysis set HR (95% CI) p All baskets 0.54 (0.41-0.72) <0.001 Excluding prostate 0.60 (0.40-0.89) n/a - 📐 RT delivered MDT for 98% of metastases (370/379); the measured effect is essentially RT-attributable
- 📊 Basket-level PFS superiority: pancreas, prostate, Other positive; breast and kidney inconclusive
- ⚠️ Primary PFS pre-specified per-protocol, not ITT; per-protocol analysis can favor the intervention arm
- ⚠️ RT dose, fractionation, and SBRT vs conventional technique not reported in source abstract
- Phase III confirmation of histology-specific MDT efficacy signals recruiting Extending Outcomes for Pancreas Cancer Patients With Nominal Oligometastatic Disease (EXPAND): A Randomized Phase III Trial Phase 3n=80 · primary completion 2029-06 · phase 3 MDT, PFS/OS primary in oligomet pancreas
- Can ctDNA dynamics refine oligometastasis definition and patient selection? n=60 · primary completion 2027-12 · ctDNA biomarker dynamics in SABR oligomet cohortrecruiting Phase II Non-Randomized Study Evaluating POSLUMA-PSMA PET Response After Oligo- Metastatic/Progressive-directed Treatment With Radiotherapy (PROMPT-R) Phase 2n=50 · primary completion 2028-05 · ctDNA dynamics after ablative RT to mets
- Why were breast and kidney baskets inconclusive (power vs biology)? n=340 · primary completion 2026-11 · phase 3 RCT of SBRT/RT MDT in oligomet breastrecruiting Cemiplimab or Cemiplimab and Fianlimab After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Phase 2n=72 · primary completion 2029-08 · kidney-specific MDT trial: SBRT in oligomet ccRCC
📚 Sources · 📄 1 paper
Abstract
2026-05-17
OligoCare
ForOligometastatic solid tumors, de novo or repeat OMD
TL;DRLocal in-field failure 5.0% at 1yr, 11.4% at 3yr (LC 88.6%) across 2447 SABR-treated oligomet pts; CRC worst.
The RT-actionable lever is minimum PTV dose, named the single most critical technical factor; de novo mets beat repeat OMD, attributed to higher delivered dose. Colorectal failed most (3yr 19.6%) despite the highest median dose/fraction, so escalate or combine for CRC rather than rely on standard SABR dosing.
- De novo OMD had better local control than repeat OMD, attributed to higher delivered dose (comparison magnitude not reported)
- vs SABR-COMET (Lancet 2019): that randomised trial showed an OS signal; OligoCare adds real-world LC, no survival endpoint
+1 more figure
| Primary | N | 1yr LF | 3yr LF |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colorectal | 518 | 9.3% | 19.6% |
| Breast | 378 | 4.1% | 11.3% |
| NSCLC | 530 | 6.0% | 9.8% |
| Prostate | 1021 | 2.7% | 8.1% |
5 details 5 trials watching
- 🔍 Prospective EORTC real-world SABR registry (OligoCare), interim analysis
- 57 institutions, 2447 eligible pts / 3533 lesions; enrolled Jul 2019-Jul 2025
- Median f/u 31 mo (min 6 mo)
- Median age 69 (28-94), 69% male
- 📐 Minimum PTV dose was the most critical technical factor; correlated with local control (dose-response magnitude not reported in source)
- ⚠️ CRC had the worst local control despite the highest median dose/fraction, flagging relative radioresistance and a need for dose-escalation/combination
- ⚠️ Only local in-field progression reported; no distant-failure, PFS, or OS, so this isn't a survival signal
- ⚠️ Real-world registry with no randomised comparator and no metastasis-directed vs systemic-only contrast; selection bias toward fitter pts likely
- Does SABR local control translate to OS or PFS benefit in oligomets? recruiting Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Rare Oligometastatic Cancers (OligoRARE) Phase NAn=200 · primary completion 2028-08 · phase 3 SBRT added to SOC, OS primaryactive Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Comprehensive Treatment of Oligometastatic (1-3 Metastases) Cancer Phase NAn=330 · primary completion 2030-11 · randomized SABR vs SOC for OS/PFS, 1-3 mets
- Optimal dose escalation or combination strategy for colorectal metastases? n=24 · primary completion 2026-01 · phase 3 SBRT + PD-1 in CRC liver metsrecruiting Personalized Ultrafractionated Stereotactic Adaptive Radiotherapy (PULSAR ) Combined With Anti-PD1,Chemotherapy and Target Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Phase 2n=116 · primary completion 2026-03 · PULSAR + anti-PD1 + chemo in MSS mCRC
- Minimum PTV dose threshold maximizing local control? recruiting OligoCare TwiCs (Trials Within Cohorts) Trial Comparing Acute Toxicity in Single-fraction vs Multiple-fraction SBRT for Metastasis-directed Treatment (SPRINT) Phase NAn=302 · primary completion 2029-02 · single- vs multi-fraction SBRT efficacy
📚 Sources · 🐦 1 tweet
📣 #ESTRO26 - @UmbertoRicardo e2irradiate @EORTC prospective OLIGOCARE registry of SABR for oligomets. ~2500 patients, ~3500 mets.
— Shankar Siva (@_ShankarSiva) May 17, 2026
➡️ local failure 5% at 1 year and 11% at 3 years
➡️ Colorectal cancer has higher risk of progression
➡️ minimum PTV dose correlated with outcome… pic.twitter.com/cx4zERqHhK
EXTEND Trial
ForOligometastatic solid tumors, multiple histology baskets
TL;DRPhase II randomized basket trial adds metastasis-directed therapy to standard of care in oligometastatic solid tumors; no effect sizes reported in source.
- Oligomet MDT lineage: SABR-COMET, STOMP, ORIOLE; EXTEND generalizes to a multi-histology basket
7 details 5 trials watching
- 🔍 Phase II randomized basket trial: MDT added to standard of care across all tumor-histology baskets
- 🔍 MDT modality, dose, fractionation, and target volume not specified in source
- 📊 Primary aggregated all-basket analysis; no effect size reported in source tweets
- 📐 Endpoints, arm sizes, and HRs not reported in source (JCO title page only)
- ⚠️ Full read requires the paper: endpoints and effect sizes live in JCO, not the source tweet
- ctDNA correlatives presented synchronously at ESTRO 2026 (#ESTRO26)
- 📄 Published JCO, May 16 2026, DOI 10.1200/JCO-25-02856
- Which histology baskets benefit most from MDT n=340 · primary completion 2026-11 · phase III MDT vs SOC in oligomet breastrecruiting Extending Outcomes for Pancreas Cancer Patients With Nominal Oligometastatic Disease (EXPAND): A Randomized Phase III Trial Phase 3n=80 · primary completion 2029-06 · phase III MDT vs SOC in oligomet pancreas PDAC
- ctDNA as a predictive biomarker for MDT benefit n=60 · primary completion 2027-12 · ctDNA biomarker dynamics during SABR for oligomet
- OS benefit and response durability of added MDT active Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Comprehensive Treatment of Oligometastatic (1-3 Metastases) Cancer Phase NAn=330 · primary completion 2030-11 · randomized SABR vs SOC, OS endpoint, 1-3 metsn=300 · primary completion 2033-11 · phase III SABR+SOC vs SOC, 2y PFS durability
📚 Sources · 🐦 1 tweet
1/ Tremendous thanks to the patients, coauthors and all who made the EXTEND trial possible. The primary aggregated analysis is now available online @JCO_ASCO with ctDNA correlatives presented synchronously at @ESTRO_RT #ESTRO26 pic.twitter.com/Zoy8DGRWbW
— Alexander Sherry (@AlexSherryMD) May 17, 2026