onc brain

About · curated by Nick Boehling, MD · @nb2276

2026-05-18

EXTEND Trial

ForOligometastatic solid tumors, 1-5 metastases, mixed histologies

TL;DRPFS HR 0.54 (0.41-0.72), p<0.001 with added MDT across oligomet baskets; RT delivered 98% of MDT.

Why it mattersRadiation oncology

RT was the MDT for 98% of metastases (370/379), so HR 0.54 is effectively an RT-attributable effect, and it holds across non-prostate histologies (HR 0.60, 0.40-0.89). That widens the oligomet MDT offer beyond the prostate-dominated prior RCTs, though breast and kidney baskets stayed inconclusive, so gate those. RT dose/fractionation not in source, so transfer specifics are uncertain.

Radiation Phase 2 trial Confirmatory

8 details 5 trials watching
  • 🔍 Multicenter randomized phase II, 1-5 mets, 6 histology baskets (breast/pancreas/kidney/2 prostate/Other) with basket-specific powering
  • 🔍 521 screened → 350 randomized → 334 per-protocol (MDT+SOC n=166, SOC n=168); median f/u 53mo, 2018-2023
  • 🔍 Translational signals (exploratory)
    • Detectable ctDNA at enrollment → shorter PFS and survival
    • ctDNA clearance at 3mo post-enrollment → improved survival
    • MDT-induced systemic immune activation greatest in PFS-superior baskets
  • 📊 PFS by analysis set (MDT+SOC vs SOC)
    Analysis setHR (95% CI)p
    All baskets0.54 (0.41-0.72)<0.001
    Excluding prostate0.60 (0.40-0.89)n/a
  • 📐 RT delivered MDT for 98% of metastases (370/379); the measured effect is essentially RT-attributable
  • 📊 Basket-level PFS superiority: pancreas, prostate, Other positive; breast and kidney inconclusive
  • ⚠️ Primary PFS pre-specified per-protocol, not ITT; per-protocol analysis can favor the intervention arm
  • ⚠️ RT dose, fractionation, and SBRT vs conventional technique not reported in source abstract
📚 Sources · 📄 1 paper
📄 PAPER Sherry; Haymaker; Wang et al. · Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (2026-05)
Addition of Metastasis-Directed Therapy to Standard of Care for Oligometastatic Solid Tumors: Primary Analysis of All Tumor-Histology Baskets of the Phase II Randomized EXTEND Trial.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We tested the hypothesis that adding metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) to standard of care (SOC) systemic therapy improves progression-free survival (PFS) among patients with oligometastatic disease.<br/><br/>METHODS: EXTEND was a multicenter randomized phase II trial. Patients with 1-5 metastases were randomized to MDT+SOC vs SOC in 1 of 6 baskets (breast, pancreas, kidney, two prostate baskets, and an "Other" basket) with basket-specific stratification and powering. PFS, the primary endpoint, was pre-specified in the per-protocol set within each basket, across all baskets, and across all baskets excluding the prostate baskets. Exploratory endpoints included circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and immune profiling.<br/><br/>RESULTS: From 2018 through 2023, 521 patients were screened, 350 were randomized, and 334 were analyzed per protocol (MDT+SOC, n=166; SOC, n=168). Radiotherapy was used as MDT for 98% of metastases (370/379). Overall, after median follow-up of 53 months, PFS was improved with MDT+SOC (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.72, p < 0.001). Similarly, PFS was improved when excluding the prostate baskets (HR, 0.60; 95% CI: 0.40 to 0.89). Within each basket, PFS superiority was identified for the pancreas, prostate, and "Other" baskets, whereas the breast and kidney baskets were inconclusive. At enrollment, detectable ctDNA correlated with shorter PFS and survival; by contrast, ctDNA clearance 3-months post-enrollment correlated with improved survival. MDT+SOC-induced systemic immune activation was most pronounced among baskets demonstrating PFS superiority.<br/><br/>CONCLUSION: The phase II EXTEND trial supports the addition of MDT to SOC for oligometastatic disease. Histology-specific efficacy signals were identified for phase III testing. Translational insights suggest the potential for optimizing the definition of oligometastasis using ctDNA, and point to systemic immune responses as a possible mechanism of benefit from MDT.
📝 Sherry AD, Haymaker C, Wang S, Liu S, Bathala TK, Medina-Rosales MN, Seo A, Hara K, Reddy J, Chun SG, Mayo LL, Walker G, Pant S, Zhao D, Kovitz CA, Ramirez D, Ha CS, Smith BD, Gomez D, Cohen L, Koong AC, Reuben A, Tannir N, Corn PG, Tran PT, Siddiqui BA, Subudhi SK, Msaouel P, Ludmir EB, Tang C. Addition of Metastasis-Directed Therapy to Standard of Care for Oligometastatic Solid Tumors: Primary Analysis of All Tumor-Histology Baskets of the Phase II Randomized EXTEND Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2026 May 16:101200JCO2502856.

2026-05-17

OligoCare

ForOligometastatic solid tumors, de novo or repeat OMD

TL;DRLocal in-field failure 5.0% at 1yr, 11.4% at 3yr (LC 88.6%) across 2447 SABR-treated oligomet pts; CRC worst.

Why it mattersRadiation oncology

The RT-actionable lever is minimum PTV dose, named the single most critical technical factor; de novo mets beat repeat OMD, attributed to higher delivered dose. Colorectal failed most (3yr 19.6%) despite the highest median dose/fraction, so escalate or combine for CRC rather than rely on standard SABR dosing.

vs leading data
  • De novo OMD had better local control than repeat OMD, attributed to higher delivered dose (comparison magnitude not reported)
  • vs SABR-COMET (Lancet 2019): that randomised trial showed an OS signal; OligoCare adds real-world LC, no survival endpoint

Radiation Real-world evidence Early signal

Local in-field progression: 5.0% at 1yr, 11.4% at 3yr; 237 events / 2447 pts.
Local in-field progression: 5.0% at 1yr, 11.4% at 3yr; 237 events / 2447 pts.
+1 more figure
OligoCare
PrimaryN1yr LF3yr LF
Colorectal5189.3%19.6%
Breast3784.1%11.3%
NSCLC5306.0%9.8%
Prostate10212.7%8.1%
5 details 5 trials watching
  • 🔍 Prospective EORTC real-world SABR registry (OligoCare), interim analysis
    • 57 institutions, 2447 eligible pts / 3533 lesions; enrolled Jul 2019-Jul 2025
    • Median f/u 31 mo (min 6 mo)
    • Median age 69 (28-94), 69% male
  • 📐 Minimum PTV dose was the most critical technical factor; correlated with local control (dose-response magnitude not reported in source)
  • ⚠️ CRC had the worst local control despite the highest median dose/fraction, flagging relative radioresistance and a need for dose-escalation/combination
  • ⚠️ Only local in-field progression reported; no distant-failure, PFS, or OS, so this isn't a survival signal
  • ⚠️ Real-world registry with no randomised comparator and no metastasis-directed vs systemic-only contrast; selection bias toward fitter pts likely
📚 Sources · 🐦 1 tweet

EXTEND Trial

ForOligometastatic solid tumors, multiple histology baskets

TL;DRPhase II randomized basket trial adds metastasis-directed therapy to standard of care in oligometastatic solid tumors; no effect sizes reported in source.

vs leading data
  • Oligomet MDT lineage: SABR-COMET, STOMP, ORIOLE; EXTEND generalizes to a multi-histology basket

Radiation Phase 2 trial Unclear

7 details 5 trials watching
  • 🔍 Phase II randomized basket trial: MDT added to standard of care across all tumor-histology baskets
  • 🔍 MDT modality, dose, fractionation, and target volume not specified in source
  • 📊 Primary aggregated all-basket analysis; no effect size reported in source tweets
  • 📐 Endpoints, arm sizes, and HRs not reported in source (JCO title page only)
  • ⚠️ Full read requires the paper: endpoints and effect sizes live in JCO, not the source tweet
  • ctDNA correlatives presented synchronously at ESTRO 2026 (#ESTRO26)
  • 📄 Published JCO, May 16 2026, DOI 10.1200/JCO-25-02856
📚 Sources · 🐦 1 tweet