onc brain

About · curated by Nick Boehling, MD · @nb2276

2026-06-09

digest generated 2026-07-19

FIRESTORM: dose-escalated RT (BED ≥79.2 Gy) near-doubles 5-yr PFS 65.8% vs 38.8% (HR 0.40) in grade 2/3 meningioma; OS flat, radionecrosis up.
Meningioma RT framed the day: FIRESTORM (non-randomized IPD pooling) links dose-escalated RT (BED ≥79.2 Gy) to near-doubled 5-yr PFS (65.8% vs 38.8%), while mature RTOG 0539 anchors the risk-adapted benchmark. Breast's RAPCHEM held 10-yr LRR at 2.9% de-escalating nodal RT by chemo response, but single-arm.

CNS

Both CNS readouts are meningioma RT dose questions: FIRESTORM tests escalation above standard postop dosing, while RTOG 0539 sets the mature risk-adapted benchmark where high-risk disease plateaus at 60Gy.

Caveats dominate

FIRESTORM

ForHigh-risk meningioma: WHO grade 2 STR or recurrent, postop RT

TL;DR5-yr PFS 65.8% vs 38.8% favoring dose-escalated RT (BED ≥79.2 Gy), HR 0.40; OS not improved.

Why it mattersRadiation oncology

The trade-off is the actionable read: escalating to BED ≥79.2 Gy (≈66 Gy/33 fx) roughly doubled 5-yr PFS (65.8% vs 38.8%) but tripled any-grade radionecrosis (33.9% vs 13.2%), with severe RN unchanged (5.1% vs 3.2%) and no OS gain. Benefit was largest after subtotal resection.

9 details 3 trials watching

Individual patient-level meta-analysis pooling 7 institutions, N=248 (59 DE-RT, 189 SD-RT). Retrospective, non-randomized; compared by Kaplan-Meier, Cox multivariable, and IPTW propensity analysis.

High-risk meningioma: 75.8% WHO grade 2, 41.5% recurrent (grade 3 the remainder), 75.2% subtotal resection.

DE-RT defined as biologically effective dose ≥79.2 Gy (equivalent 66 Gy/33 fx); SD-RT comparator conventionally fractionated 59.4 Gy/33 fx or 60 Gy/30 fx. Mixed photon/carbon vs photon-alone DE-RT showed no PFS difference (81.3% vs 92.0% at 3y, P=.34).

Primary: progression-free survival, DE-RT vs SD-RT. Also overall survival and CNS radionecrosis.

OS not improved despite the PFS gain: 5-yr OS 83.8% vs 68.4% (P=.056 UVA), non-significant on MVA (HR 0.66, P=.27) and IPTW (HR 0.77, P=.42).

EndpointDE-RTSD-RT
3-yr PFS86.4%55.6%
5-yr PFS65.8%38.8%
Adjusted HR (MVA)0.40 (0.24-0.69), P=.001ref
IPTW HR0.45 (0.24-0.83), P=.01ref
RadionecrosisDE-RTSD-RT
Any grade33.9% (20/59)13.2% (25/189)
Grade 3+5.1%3.2%

Any-grade radionecrosis higher with DE-RT (33.9% vs 13.2%, P=.001) but grade 3+ similar (5.1% vs 3.2%); most RN was low-grade.

Standard-dose postoperative meningioma RT (RTOG-0539 high-risk 60 Gy, EORTC-22042 60 Gy) sits at/below this cohort's SD-RT arm; the dose-response signal here motivates the ongoing randomized escalation question.

high-risk meningioma (WHO grade 2 subtotally resected or recurrent, plus grade 3) receiving postoperative fractionated RT
Does not represent gross-totally-resected grade 1 disease, upfront observation, or radiosurgery-only management.

Retrospective non-randomized pooling: DE-RT allocation confounded, IPTW mitigates but cannot fully adjust. PFS gain without OS benefit; prior-RT and grade imbalance across arms.

Retrospective non-randomized IPD pooling; DE-RT allocation confounded despite IPTW. PFS-only gain, no OS benefit. Signal supports escalation but needs randomized confirmation.

In high-risk meningioma (WHO grade 2, subtotally resected or recurrent) receiving postoperative RT, this supports a higher dose (BED ≥79.2 Gy) for local control; it does not extend to gross-totally-resected grade 1 disease or establish an OS benefit.

Sourced from Singh, Raj et al.

📚 Sources · 📄 1 paper
📄 PAPER Singh, Raj; Koempel, Andrew; French, Beck et al. · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics (2026-07)
Improved Progression-Free Survival Following Dose-Escalated Versus Standard-Dose Postoperative Radiation Therapy for High-Risk Meningiomas: An International Multicenter Individual Patient–Level Meta-Analysis (FIRESTORM)
Abstract
PURPOSE: We performed an individual patient-level meta-analysis of high-risk meningiomas to compare the outcomes of dose-escalated radiation therapy (DE-RT) versus standard-dose postoperative radiation therapy (SD-RT).<br/><br/>METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 7 institutions participated. DE-RT was defined as treatment with a biologically effective dose of &#x2265;79.2 Gy (equivalent of 66 Gy in 33 fractions). We compared progression-free survival (PFS) with DE-RT versus SD-RT via Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank t tests, a Cox proportional hazards multivariable model, and propensity score analyses with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). We also compared incidences of central nervous system radionecrosis (RN) with DE-RT versus SD-RT.<br/><br/>RESULTS: The analysis included 248 patients with high-risk meningioma (59 received DE-RT and 189 received SD-RT). One hundred and eighty-eight cases (75.8%) were World Health Organization grade 2, and 103 cases (41.5%) were recurrent meningiomas. Extent of resection was subtotal resection in 182 of 248 (75.2%). Three- and 5-year PFS rates were 62.8% (95% CI, 55.8%-69.0%) and 45.0% (95% CI, 37.3%-52.3%), respectively. DE-RT was associated with superior PFS rates (P = .0022), with 3-year (86.4% vs 55.6%) and 5-year (65.8% vs 38.8%) PFS rates favoring DE-RT. On multivariable analysis, DE-RT was associated with superior PFS (hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.24-0.69; P = .001). On IPTW, DE-RT continued to be associated with superior PFS (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.24-0.83; P = .01). A greater incidence of any grade RN was observed following DE-RT (20 of 59; 33.9%) versus SD-RT (25 of 189; 13.2%) (P = .001) but with similar grade 3 or greater RN events (DE-RT 5.1% vs SD-RT 3.2%).<br/><br/>CONCLUSIONS: DE-RT resulted in superior PFS for patients with high-risk meningiomas over SD-RT without an increase in severe toxicities.
Confirmatory

RTOG 0539 NCT00895622

ForWHO grade 1-3 meningioma, post-resection, newly diagnosed or recurrent

TL;DR10-yr PFS 72.2% intermediate-risk (54Gy) and 42.5% high-risk (60Gy) meningioma on adjuvant RT; low-risk observed 85.2%.

Why it mattersRadiation oncology

The RT read is patient selection: low-risk grade 1 (GTR/STR) observed carried only 8.9% 10-yr cumulative progression, backing omission, while intermediate-risk earns 54Gy/30fx adjuvant. High-risk 60Gy still leaves 39.3% 10-yr progression, marking the ceiling of adjuvant RT alone in grade 2/3 disease.

7 details 5 trials watching

Prospective phase 2, multi-institutional (NRG/RTOG), risk-adapted by WHO grade, extent of resection, and recurrence status. 244 consented, 165 protocol-treated. Central pathology review; data cutoff 8/15/2023.

Adults ≥18, Zubrod 0-1, histologically confirmed unifocal WHO grade 1-3 meningioma, any resection extent. Low-risk n=60, intermediate n=52, high-risk n=53.

Intermediate-risk 54 Gy and high-risk 60 Gy, both in 30 fractions, adjuvant. Low-risk received no RT (observation). No hypofractionation or SRS arm.

Primary (3-yr PFS) reported previously. This analysis reports long-term PFS, OS, and cumulative incidence of progression (competing-risk) at ~12-yr median follow-up.

Per-cohort 10-yr PFS, OS, and cumulative-incidence values are in the table above. Median PFS not reached for low- and intermediate-risk.

Cohort (management)10-yr PFS10-yr OS10-yr cum. incidence progression
Low-risk, observed85.2%94.1%8.9% (3.2-18.2)
Intermediate, 54Gy72.2%84.7%21.2% (10.8-33.9)
High-risk, 60Gy42.5%51.1%39.3% (25.8-52.5)

RT-attributable grade 3+ toxicity 9.6% (intermediate, 5/52) and 15.1% (high-risk, 8/53). The observed low-risk cohort carried no RT toxicity.

No randomised RT-vs-observation trial in grade 2 meningioma has reported. ROAM/EORTC-1308 and NRG-BN003 (GTR grade 2) remain open; RTOG 0539 is the prospective benchmark.

newly diagnosed or recurrent unifocal WHO grade 1-3 meningioma across resection extents, risk-stratified
Does not represent multifocal meningioma or patients treated with SRS or hypofractionation.

Each risk cohort is single-arm, no randomised RT-vs-observation comparison; modest per-cohort N (~50-60); grading predates molecular integration into WHO CNS grading.

Prospective multi-institutional risk-adapted phase 2, 12-yr mature f/u, sets RT patient-selection benchmark. Each cohort single-arm; no randomised RT-vs-observation comparison.

In newly diagnosed grade 1 meningioma after gross or subtotal resection, this supports observation over adjuvant RT; it does not soften the case for 54-60Gy in recurrent grade 1, grade 2, or grade 3 disease.

Sourced from Kotecha, Rupesh et al.

📚 Sources · 📄 1 paper
📄 PAPER Kotecha, Rupesh; Polley, Mei-Yin; Vogelbaum, Michael A. et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology (2026-05)
Long-Term Analysis of NRG Oncology RTOG 0539: A Phase II Trial of Observation for Low-Risk Meningioma and Radiotherapy for Intermediate- and High-Risk Meningioma
Abstract
NRG Oncology RTOG 0539 was a prospective phase II trial of risk-adapted radiotherapy for patients with WHO grade 1-3 meningioma. Low-risk (group 1, n = 60) was defined as a grade 1 tumor after gross total resection or subtotal resection (GTR/STR) and prospectively monitored. Intermediate-risk (group 2, n = 52) was defined as recurrent grade 1 or newly diagnosed grade 2 tumor after GTR and treated with radiotherapy (54 Gy). High-risk (group 3, n = 53) included a newly diagnosed grade 2 tumor after STR, newly diagnosed grade 3 tumor, or recurrent grade 2 or 3 tumor and treated with radiotherapy (60 Gy). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median follow-up times for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk cohorts were 12.1, 12.0, and 11.1 years, respectively. The 10-year PFS and OS rates for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk cohorts were 85.2% and 94.1%, 72.2% and 84.7%, and 42.5% and 51.1%, respectively. Five patients (9.6%) and eight patients (15.1%) had a grade 3+ toxicity attributed to radiotherapy in the intermediate- and high-risk cohorts, respectively. The long-term outcomes using this risk-adapted approach support observation for low-risk patients, inform radiotherapy patient selection and practice standards for intermediate- and high-risk patients, and provide comparative benchmarks for future trials.

Breast

Response-adapted RT de-escalation after neoadjuvant chemo, still awaiting the randomized NSABP B-51/RTOG 1304 answer.

Early signal

RAPCHEM

ForSmall (<5cm) cN1 breast, post-neoadjuvant chemo + surgery, mostly ALND

TL;DR10-yr locoregional recurrence 2.9% (24/838) with radiotherapy de-escalated by nodal response to neoadjuvant chemo; no comparator arm.

Reported via The ASCO Post →

Why it mattersRadiation oncology

The RT read is the intermediate arm: pts with 1-3 residual nodes got breast RT with regional nodal RT omitted, yet 10-yr LRR held at 3.2%. With low-risk mastectomy pts left with no RT (2.4%), this is the uncontrolled signal behind omitting nodal RT after partial nodal response to NAC, the question B-51 will settle.

7 details 3 trials watching

Prospective, non-randomized multicentre cohort (BOOG 2010-03), 17 Dutch centres, enrolled 2011-2015. Single arm, no with-vs-without RT comparator. 10-year follow-up.

Small (<5 cm) breast cancer with 1-3 clinically involved nodes, treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy then surgery. Most underwent axillary lymph node dissection. N=848 (838 with follow-up).

RT allocated by post-chemo nodal status. Low (node-negative): breast RT after BCS, RT omitted after mastectomy. Intermediate (1-3 residual nodes): breast/chest wall, regional nodal RT omitted. High (≥4 nodes): breast/chest wall plus nodal RT. Dose/fractionation not reported in source.

Locoregional recurrence (breast, chest wall, or nodal, without distant disease) at 10 years. No formal primary-endpoint statistic reported in source.

Overall 10-yr LRR 2.9% (24/838). Rates stayed low across all three tailored groups, including the de-escalated arms (see table).

Risk groupRT approach10-yr LRR
Low (node-negative after chemo)Breast RT after BCS; RT omitted after mastectomy2.4% (7/291)
Intermediate (few residual nodes)Breast/chest wall, regional nodes not treated3.2% (12/370)
High (many residual nodes)Breast/chest wall + regional nodal RT2.8% (5/177)

Consistent with the de-escalation direction of trials testing nodal RT after NAC, but the randomized answer is **NSABP B-51/RTOG 1304 (NCT01872975)**, testing nodal RT in pts converting to ypN0, expected ~3 years.

small cN1 breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemo and surgery, mostly with axillary dissection
Does not represent node-negative-at-baseline disease, tumors ≥5 cm, or a modern SLNB-staged axilla.

Single-arm and uncontrolled: cannot show tailored RT is non-inferior to standard fields. ALND-era staging limits transfer to current SLNB practice. Dose/fractionation and per-group RT compliance not reported in source.

Single-arm, uncontrolled cohort with no with-vs-without RT comparator; cannot show tailored de-escalation is safe. Randomized answer (NSABP B-51) still pending.

In cN1 breast cancer with 1-3 residual nodes after neoadjuvant chemo, this uncontrolled 10-yr data supports reduced-field RT with regional nodes left untreated; it does not extend to pts with ≥4 residual nodes, who still received nodal RT.

📚 Sources · 📄 1 paper
📄 PAPER · The ASCO Post
Breast Cancer Recurrence Remains Low—Even After 10 Years—With Radiotherapy Tailored to Patient’s Individual Risk
Abstract
“The results of our study show that tailoring the extent of radiotherapy according to how well the chemotherapy has worked to treat cancer in the lymph nodes leads to very low and reassuring recurrenc...
📝 Breast Cancer Recurrence Remains Low Even After 10 Years With Radiotherapy Tailored to Patient’s Individual Risk - The ASCO Post