onc brain

About Β· curated by Nick Boehling, MD Β· @nb2276

2026-08-07

digest generated 2026-08-11

STELLAR: 5x5Gy + CAPOX matches 50Gy/25f CRT on 3yr DFS (64.5% v 62.3%, HR 0.883, upper bound 1.11 under a 1.43 margin) in LARC.
Rectal carried the day, and both trials moved chemo, not RT: STELLAR shows short-course IMRT plus CAPOX is non-inferior to long-course CRT at the cost of grade III-V toxicity 26.5% v 12.6%, while TNTCRT keeps long-course RT and wins DFS on distant control (HR 0.674) with locoregional failure flat at ~6% in both arms. Prostate offered no new randomised data, only PSMA PET observational and response-assessment positions.

Prostate

Both entries are PSMA PET interpretation, not treatment data: a post-salvage-RT natural history cohort and a counterpoint talk arguing SUVmax change is not yet a validated response endpoint.

Early signal

PSMA PET Natural History Study in PSMA-Positive BCR

ForBiochemically recurrent prostate ca, post-definitive + salvage RT, PSA β‰₯ 0.5

TL;DRBaseline data on first 130 pts: most BCR men with PSADT >9-12mo still have PSMA PET findings once PSA exceeds 5.

Reported via UroToday β†’

Why it mattersRadiation oncology

The RT-relevant point is where the disease sits: prostate bed recurrence and nodal disease are the dominant baseline patterns, all in men who already had or declined salvage RT. If most slow-PSADT pts light up above PSA 5, PET positivity alone cannot gate metastasis-directed SBRT, and the trigger has to come from kinetics or serial change.

Monday clinic

In post-salvage-RT BCR with PSADT over 9mo and a PSMA PET showing a few nodal or bed lesions, this supports serial imaging over reflex systemic therapy; it says nothing about pts with rapid PSADT or conventional-imaging metastases.

The longer read
11 details

Prospective observational natural history cohort at the NCI, presented at GU-ASCO 2026. Baseline data on the first 130 pts; the cohort is ongoing at a median follow-up of about 2 years with interim outcome data pending.

Men with biochemical recurrence after definitive therapy, all of whom had already received salvage radiation or declined it. PSA β‰₯ 0.5 required for a baseline PET. Deliberately framed as PSMA-positive BCR, a state that would not have been detectable in the historical trials these pts map onto and that excluded them from metastatic trials.

The presented analysis is cross-sectional: PSMA PET findings at baseline against PSA doubling time, the field's working predictor of metastasis in BCR. Imaging cadence is protocolized at annual if the baseline PET is negative, every 6 months if anything is seen, including equivocal findings.

Among pts with slow kinetics (PSADT > 9mo and > 12mo), the majority still had PSMA PET findings once PSA was above 5: nodal disease, prostate bed recurrence, and small equivocal bone lesions. Only about a third have started any therapy. A companion poster found 5 of the first ~150 pts progressed on conventional imaging at roughly 1.5yr, and over 95% showed no abrupt PET change out of step with PSA.

post-definitive-therapy BCR with PSA β‰₯ 0.5 who have had or declined salvage radiation
Does not represent conventional-imaging metastatic disease, hormone-sensitive de novo metastatic pts, or men below the PSA 0.5 eligibility floor.

The counts are reported conversationally in an interview ("about 130", "the first 150 or so", "that number's five"), with no stratum denominators and no CIs, so the PSADT-by-PET relationship cannot be quantified from this source. Allowing any therapy under 6 months, including SBRT and intermittent ADT, means the observed group is not an untreated comparator.

The claim being staked is that PSMA PET positivity in BCR is near-ubiquitous above PSA 5 and therefore weakly discriminating, so it should not by itself trigger treatment. What the cohort has not yet shown is whether PET burden or its change over time adds anything to PSA doubling time for predicting the outcomes that matter.

Baseline cross-sectional read of an ongoing single-institution cohort, median f/u ~2yr, no outcome analysis yet. Numbers reported conversationally, not tabulated.

  • Does PET burden or its change add to PSA doubling time for predicting progression?
  • Which PSMA-positive BCR pts can safely be observed off therapy?
  • Are small equivocal bone lesions on PSMA PET true metastases?
πŸ“š Sources Β· πŸ“„ 1 paper
πŸ“„ PAPER Β· UroToday
PSMA PET in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer a Natural History Study Observing Men with PSMA Positive Findings - Melissa Abel
Abstract
UroToday - GU OncToday brings coverage of the clinically relevant content needed to stay at the forefront of the dynamic field of GU oncology and urology.
πŸ“ https://www.urotoday.com/video-lectures/asco-gu-2026/video/5445-psma-pet-in-biochemically-recurrent-prostate-cancer-a-natural-history-study-observing-men-with-psma-positive-findings-melissa-abel.html?mtm_campaign=Abel_SocialVideo_ID5445
Unclear

USPCC 2026 Point-Counterpoint: PSMA PET Response Assessment in APMR

ForAPMR / mCRPC starting ARSI or bipolar androgen therapy, serial PSMA PET considered

TL;DRHigh vs low Ξ΄-percent SUVmax carried HR 5.03 (1.17-21.65) for OS; Ξ΄-absolute SUVmax HR 9.31 (1.81-47.87).

Reported via UroToday β†’

Why it mattersRadiation oncology

The prognostic separation is real but the direction of uptake change is the confound: ADT and ARSI can raise PSMA expression independent of burden, so a flare on restaging PET after starting an ARSI is not evidence to abandon a planned metastasis-directed course. Timing of the post-treatment scan relative to systemic therapy start is the parameter that gates interpretation.

Monday clinic

In APMR pts imaged shortly after starting abiraterone, enzalutamide, or bipolar androgen therapy, rising PSMA uptake does not reliably separate progression from AR-driven expression change; it does not speak to baseline staging PET, where the evidence base is separate.

The longer read
9 details 5 trials watching

A point-counterpoint conference presentation, arguing the negative position. The evidence marshalled is three published studies: a prospective single-arm imaging trial (n=16 evaluable), a bipolar androgen therapy series (n=6), and the RECIP 1.0 framework paper.

The anchor trial enrolled pts with APMR starting abiraterone or enzalutamide, imaged with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT immediately before therapy and again at 2-4 months. The BAT series imaged at baseline and 3 months.

Prognostic separation was consistent across both quantitative stratifiers, with DPSM HR 5.03 (95% CI 1.17-21.65) and DASM HR 9.31 (95% CI 1.81-47.87) for overall survival. A mixed but predominantly increased uptake pattern marked the shorter time to therapy change.

StratifierMedian time to therapy changeMedian OSp (TTC / OS)
Low DPSM12.2 mo (11.3-NA)37.2 mo (28.9-NA)reference
High DPSM6.5 mo (4.6-NA)17.8 mo (13.9-NA)0.0001 / 0.02
Low DASM12.2 mo (11.3-NA)NA (37.2-NA)reference
High DASM6.9 mo (6.1-NA)17.8 mo (13.9-NA)0.003 / 0.002

RECIP 1.0 is the field's standardization attempt, categorizing PD/PR/SD/CR by combining PSMA PET with CT, but it was derived in the radioligand therapy setting and its transfer to AR-directed therapy is exactly what Rowe argues is unestablished.

Beyond the small samples, the measurement layer itself is unvalidated: repeatability work using Bland-Altman, ICC, and within-subject coefficient of variation found lesion identification and segmentation variability material even above 1.5 cmΒ³. A biomarker whose test-retest behaviour is uncertain cannot support a serial-change decision rule.

The talk separates two claims that often get merged: that post-therapy PSMA PET change is prognostic, which the data support, and that it is a valid response assessment, which requires reproducibility and a therapy-independent relationship between uptake and burden. Prognostic value in a 16-patient series does not license per-patient treatment decisions.

Conference position talk, not a result. Its supporting datasets are n=16 and n=6 prospective series; no comparative design establishes or refutes PET response assessment.

πŸ“š Sources Β· πŸ“„ 1 paper
πŸ“„ PAPER Β· UroToday
USPCC 2026: Point-Counterpoint 1: PSMA PET Has No Role at Present as a Response Assessment
Abstract
metastatic androgen pathway modulation resistant prostate cancer, Bipolar androgen therapy, PSMA PET imaging, 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT, PSMA-targeted PET agents.
πŸ“ https://www.urotoday.com/conference-highlights/uspcc-2026/170965-uspcc-2026-point-counterpoint-1-psma-pet-has-no-role-at-present-as-a-response-assessment.html?mtm_campaign=170965_SocialUSPCC26_ID170965

GI Lower

Two phase III TNT architectures, one dropping to 25Gy/5fx and one keeping long-course CRT, both improving DFS through systemic timing while locoregional control stays flat.

Confirmatory

STELLAR NCT02533271

ForDistal/middle-third rectal adeno, cT3-4 and/or cN+, age 18-70, ECOG 0-1

3-year disease-free survival surrogate

64.5% v 62.3%

HR 0.883, 1-sided 95% CI to 1.11, P<.001 for noninferiority

TL;DR3yr DFS 64.5% v 62.3% (HR 0.883, NI margin 1.43, P<.001 NI): 5x5Gy then CAPOX non-inferior to 50Gy/25f CRT in LARC.

Why it mattersRadiation oncology

Every pt got IMRT, unlike RAPIDO, Polish II or PRODIGE 23, and 3yr LRR was 8.4% v 11.0% with 25Gy/5fx to a full elective pelvic CTV, so the short-course arm did not trade local control for convenience. Compliance was the mechanism: 100% completed 5x5Gy with no dose reduction. This supports offering 5x5Gy over 50Gy/25f when the systemic phase is the priority.

Monday clinic

In cT3-4 or node-positive mid/low rectal cancer where getting full-dose neoadjuvant chemo delivered is the constraint, this supports 25Gy/5fx followed by CAPOX instead of long-course chemoradiation; it does not extend to upper rectal tumors or pts over 70, both excluded.

The longer read
12 details 5 trials watching

Multicenter open-label randomized phase III noninferiority trial, 16 hospitals across 11 provinces of China, accrual August 2015 to August 2018, N=599 randomly assigned 1:1 (TNT 302, CRT 297). Stratified by tumor location, clinical stage and MRF status; median follow-up 35.0 months (range 8.3-63.9).

Age 18-70, ECOG 0-1, rectal adenocarcinoma of the distal or middle third (0-10cm from anal verge), cT3-4 and/or node-positive, no distant metastases, no prior anticancer treatment. Arms were balanced: cT4 15.9% v 12.8%, MRF involvement 56.3% v 56.2%, clinical stage III 85.8% v 83.5%.

TNT arm received 25Gy in 5 fractions over one week; CRT arm 50Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks with concurrent capecitabine 825mg/m2 twice daily. All patients received IMRT, a departure from RAPIDO, Polish II and PRODIGE 23. CTV covered mesorectum, presacral space, internal iliac, obturator nodes and ischiorectal fossa; superior border at the sacral promontory, inferior 2-3cm distal to the tumor, external iliacs added only for cT4b; CTV-to-PTV expansion 0.5-1.0cm.

TNT arm: 4 cycles CAPOX (oxaliplatin 130mg/m2 day 1, capecitabine 1,000mg/m2 twice daily days 1-14) starting 7-14 days after radiotherapy, then TME, then 2 further cycles. CRT arm: concurrent capecitabine during radiotherapy, then TME, then 6 cycles CAPOX. Total mesorectal excision was scheduled 6-8 weeks after preoperative treatment in both arms; a watch-and-wait pathway was permitted for clinical complete responders.

Primary: 3-year disease-free survival, noninferiority claimed if the upper bound of the 95% CI of the HR was at or below 1.43 (an 11% absolute margin against an assumed 65% CRT rate). Secondary endpoints were overall survival, metastasis-free survival, locoregional recurrence and surgical complications. Target accrual 600 with at least 194 DFS events for 80% power at one-sided alpha 0.05.

Acute grade III-V toxicity during preoperative treatment was 26.5% with TNT versus 12.6% with CRT (P<.001), driven almost entirely by hematologic events (grade 3-4 15.8% v 2.0%, P<.001) rather than by anything the radiotherapy added. Radiotherapy delivery itself was cleaner in the short-course arm, with no dose reductions at all, and grade III+ surgical complications were comparable (14.0% v 15.7%, P=.625). Grade III-IV toxicity during adjuvant chemotherapy ran lower after TNT (3.3% v 11.8%, P=.003).

STELLAR is the third randomized trial of short-course radiotherapy plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy against long-course CRT, after Polish II and RAPIDO, with PRODIGE 23 addressing the adjacent question of chemotherapy sequencing around long-course CRT. Its 3-year LRR of 8.4% with TNT sits alongside RAPIDO and PRODIGE 23 (4%-8.3%) and well below Polish II (21%-22%), which enrolled a heavier fixed cT3/cT4 population. Unlike RAPIDO and PRODIGE 23, STELLAR showed no reduction in distant metastasis (3-year DM 22.8% v 24.7%), and its OS advantage mirrors the early Polish II signal that later disappeared at 8 years.

cT3-4 or node-positive adenocarcinoma of the middle and lower rectum in patients aged 18-70 fit for oxaliplatin doublet chemotherapy and TME
Does not represent upper rectal tumors, patients over 70, MRF-negative early cT3 disease selected for chemotherapy alone, or the watch-and-wait population, since only 9.4% versus 3.4% went to nonoperative management.

The 11% noninferiority margin is wide, and the authors concede in retrospect that a narrower margin or larger sample would have been defensible given how close the arms proved. Distant metastasis, the endpoint short-course TNT was designed to move, did not separate at all (22.8% v 24.7%), which weakens the mechanistic case for the OS difference. Adjuvant chemotherapy completion also differed between arms (60.0% v 48.3%, P=.009), so postoperative treatment intensity is not held constant across the comparison.

The defensible read is the primary endpoint: 25Gy in 5 fractions followed by CAPOX delivers the same 3-year DFS and the same locoregional control as 50Gy in 25 fractions, in one week of radiotherapy instead of five. The 11.4-point OS separation is the number that will be quoted and the one least supported, since neither MFS nor LRR moved and the same pattern in Polish II did not survive longer follow-up. What transfers most reliably is the technique: full elective pelvic coverage with IMRT at 5x5Gy, delivered without a single dose reduction.

Endpoint (3yr)TNTCRTEffect size
DFS (1Β°)64.5% (58.3-70.7)62.3% (56.1-68.5)HR 0.883, 1-sided 95% CI to 1.11, P<.001 NI
OS86.5% (82.1-90.8)75.1% (69.4-80.8)HR 0.67 (0.46-0.97), P=.033
MFS77.1% (71.7-82.6)75.3% (70.0-80.7)HR 0.88 (0.63-1.24), P=.475
LRR8.4% (4.6-12.2)11.0% (6.5-15.5)HR 0.80 (0.45-1.44), P=.461
SubgroupDFS HR (95% CI), POS HR (95% CI), P
cT40.621 (0.328 to 1.177), .1440.362 (0.152 to 0.859), .021
Distance to anal verge ≀5cm0.706 (0.485 to 1.028), .0700.540 (0.318 to 0.916), .022
cT2-30.916 (0.674 to 1.245), .5750.752 (0.493 to 1.149), .187
Distance >5cm1.120 (0.744 to 1.687), .5870.808 (0.468 to 1.394), .443
CONSORT flow
Assessed / enrolled 629
↓ 30 excluded
Randomized 599
↓
TNT (25Gy/5fx + CAPOX)
allocated 302
analyzed 302
3yr DFS 64.5%
CRT (50Gy/25f + capecitabine)
allocated 297
analyzed 297
3yr DFS 62.3%

Prespecified noninferiority met on 3yr DFS with adequate accrual, but open-label, 35mo follow-up only, and the OS gain is a secondary endpoint unsupported by MFS or LRR.

Sourced from Jin, Jing et al.

πŸ“š Sources Β· πŸ“„ 1 paper
πŸ“„ PAPER Jin, Jing; Tang, Yuan; Hu, Chen et al. Β· Journal of Clinical Oncology (2022-05)
Multicenter, Randomized, Phase III Trial of Short-Term Radiotherapy Plus Chemotherapy Versus Long-Term Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (STELLAR)
Abstract
PURPOSE To ascertain if preoperative short-term radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy is not inferior to a standard schedule of long-term chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with distal or middle-third, clinical primary tumor stage 3-4 and/or regional lymph node–positive rectal cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to short-term radiotherapy (25 Gy in five fractions over 1 week) followed by four cycles of chemotherapy (total neoadjuvant therapy [TNT]) or chemoradiotherapy (50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks, concurrently with capecitabine [chemoradiotherapy; CRT]). Total mesorectal excision was undertaken 6-8 weeks after preoperative treatment, with two additional cycles of CAPOX (intravenous oxaliplatin [130 mg/m 2 , once a day] on day 1 and capecitabine [1,000 mg/m 2 , twice a day] from days 1 to 14) in the TNT group and six cycles of CAPOX in the CRT group. The primary end point was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS Between August 2015 and August 2018, a total of 599 patients were randomly assigned to receive TNT (n = 302) or CRT (n = 297). At a median follow-up of 35.0 months, 3-year DFS was 64.5% and 62.3% in TNT and CRT groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.883; one-sided 95% CI, not applicable to 1.11; P &lt; .001 for noninferiority). There was no significant difference in metastasis-free survival or locoregional recurrence, but the TNT group had better 3-year overall survival than the CRT group (86.5% v 75.1%; P = .033). Treatment effects on DFS and overall survival were similar regardless of prognostic factors. The prevalence of acute grade III-V toxicities during preoperative treatment was 26.5% in the TNT group versus 12.6% in the CRT group ( P &lt; .001). CONCLUSION Short-term radiotherapy with preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery was efficacious with acceptable toxicity and could be used as an alternative to CRT for locally advanced rectal cancer.
Confirmatory

TNTCRT NCT03177382

ForHigh-risk stage II/III rectal cancer, cT4/cN2/MRF+/EMVI, age ≀70

Disease-free survival surrogate

HR 0.674

95% CI 0.489-0.929, P=.016; 3-year DFS 74.8% v 66.0%

TL;DR3-year DFS 74.8% v 66.0%, HR 0.674, for doublet CAPOX bracketing long-course chemoradiation vs conventional nCRT in high-risk LARC.

Why it mattersRadiation oncology

RT is fixed in both arms, so the RT read is what intensified chemo does around it: locoregional failure stayed 6.03% v 6.19% and the DFS gain is distant. The pCR jump (26.37% v 9.80%) is the lever for organ-preservation selection. LCRT dose and fractionation are not reported in source text.

Monday clinic

In MRI-defined high-risk stage II/III rectal cancer at or under age 70, this supports doublet CAPOX bracketing long-course chemoradiation over nCRT plus adjuvant chemo; it does not extend to pts over 70 or to short-course RT based TNT.

The longer read
8 details 5 trials watching

Multicenter randomized phase III, N=458, accrual June 6, 2017 to December 27, 2023, median follow-up 51 months. Primary endpoint: DFS. Blinding is not reported and the two regimens are not maskable.

Stage II/III LARC aged 18 to 70 with at least one MRI high-risk feature (cT4a-b, cN2, mesorectal fascia involvement, or cT3c-d with EMVI). Baseline burden was heavy: cT4 47.82%, cN2 75.98%, threatened MRF 70.96%, EMVI 54.80%.

Experimental: one cycle induction CAPOX, LCRT with two cycles concurrent CAPOX, three cycles consolidation CAPOX, then surgery, so all cytotoxic therapy precedes resection. Control: LCRT with concurrent capecitabine, surgery, then six cycles adjuvant CAPOX at 4 to 8 weeks.

Long-course RT in both arms, so RT is the fixed element and the randomized variable is chemotherapy timing plus oxaliplatin exposure. Dose, fractionation, technique and target volume are not reported in the source text, nor is whether concurrent doublet chemotherapy altered RT delivery.

Primary: DFS. Secondary results reported here: MFS, pCR, locoregional failure, overall survival, grade β‰₯3 adverse events, major postoperative complications.

Primary endpoint met, with MFS moving in step and pCR strongly favoring the experimental arm, while locoregional failure and 3-year OS did not separate. See the efficacy table.

EndpointDoublet-LC TNTnCRTEffect size
3-year DFS (primary)74.8%66.0%HR 0.674 (0.489-0.929), P=.016
3-year MFS77.7%67.6%HR 0.655 (0.469-0.915), P=.013
pCR26.37%9.80%P<.001
Locoregional failure6.03%6.19%P=.943
3-year OS90.2%87.5%P=.167
MeasureDoublet-LC TNTnCRTP
Grade β‰₯3 AE, neoadjuvant phase27.59%8.56%<.001
Severe toxicity, entire course28.02%24.32%.371
Major postoperative complications3.98%2.94%.567

Grade β‰₯3 toxicity front-loads into the neoadjuvant phase with the doublet, but severe toxicity across the entire treatment course and major postoperative complications were comparable. Total mesorectal excision was performed in approximately 87% (TNT) and 90% (nCRT).

Sits alongside RAPIDO, PRODIGE-23 and STELLAR, the trials that established TNT, but keeps long-course chemoradiation as the RT backbone rather than short-course RT. Unlike RAPIDO's longer follow-up, intensification here did not increase locoregional failure.

MRI-defined high-risk stage II/III rectal cancer with cT4, cN2, threatened MRF or EMVI, aged 70 or under, treated with long-course chemoradiation
Does not represent pts older than 70, stage II disease without a high-risk feature, or short-course RT based TNT.

Control-arm adjuvant CAPOX delivery and completion are not reported, and a TNT advantage partly reflects therapy planned but not received when postoperative chemotherapy under-delivers. Accrual spanned 2017 to 2023, during which TNT became routine, so control-arm contemporaneity drifted. Age was capped at 70.

The gain is distant, not local: MFS tracks DFS while locoregional failure is flat and low in both arms, which says long-course chemoradiation with a fluoropyrimidine is near its local ceiling in this population and the remaining room is systemic. The pCR tripling is the organ-preservation lever, but pCR is a resection-specimen endpoint and this trial did not test nonoperative management.

CONSORT flow
Randomized 458
↓
Doublet-LC TNT
allocated 232
3-year DFS 74.8%
nCRT
allocated 226
3-year DFS 66.0%

Randomized phase III, primary DFS met at 51mo median f/u, but TNT is already established by RAPIDO, PRODIGE-23, STELLAR; this refines regimen rather than the paradigm.

Sourced from Wang, Xin et al., Wang X et al.

πŸ“š Sources Β· πŸ“„ 2 papers
πŸ“„ PAPER Wang, Xin; Tang, Yuanling; Lu, Junyang et al. Β· Journal of Clinical Oncology (2026-07)
Total Neoadjuvant Therapy With Long-Course Radiotherapy Versus Chemoradiotherapy in High-Risk Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (TNTCRT): A Multicenter, Randomized, Phase III Trial
Abstract
PURPOSE High-risk locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) carries a substantial risk of distant recurrence, which limits disease-free survival (DFS). We compared total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) integrating long-course radiotherapy (LCRT) with uninterrupted doublet chemotherapy (doublet-LC TNT) versus conventional neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). METHODS In this multicenter, randomized, phase III trial, patients with stage II/III LARC and at least 1 high-risk feature (cT4a-b, cN2, mesorectal fascia involvement, or cT3c-d with extramural vascular invasion) were enrolled. Patients were assigned to doublet-LC TNT (induction, concurrent, and consolidation capecitabine plus oxaliplatin with LCRT) before surgery or nCRT (capecitabine with LCRT) followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. The primary end point was DFS (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03177382 ). RESULTS Between June 6, 2017, and December 27, 2023, 458 patients were randomly assigned to doublet-LC TNT (n = 232) or nCRT (n = 226). At a median follow-up of 51 months, doublet-LC TNT improved 3-year DFS (74.8% v 66.0%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.674 [95% CI, 0.489 to 0.929]; P = .016). Metastasis-free survival (MFS; 77.7% v 67.6%; HR, 0.655 [95% CI, 0.469 to 0.915]) and pathologic complete response rates (pCR; 26.37% v 9.80%; P &lt; .001) were higher with doublet-LC TNT, whereas locoregional failure remained low and comparable (6.03% v 6.19%; P = .943). Although grade β‰₯3 adverse events during the neoadjuvant phase were more frequent with doublet-LC TNT (27.59% v 8.56%; P &lt; .001), severe toxicities during the entire treatment course (28.02% v 24.32%; P = .371) and major postoperative complications (3.98% v 2.94%; P = .567) were comparable. CONCLUSION Compared with conventional nCRT, doublet-LC TNT improved DFS, MFS, and pCR rates with manageable toxicity. These findings support this intensified, doublet-based regimen as a standard option within the modern TNT paradigm. Further comparative studies are warranted to evaluate these results against other short-course radiotherapy‑based or nondoublet-concurrent TNT regimens.
πŸ“„ PAPER Wang X; Tang Y; Lu J Β· The ASCO Post (2026-07)
Total Neoadjuvant Therapy With Long-Course RT and Uninterrupted Doublet Chemo Offers Efficacy Benefits in High-Risk Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer